From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/17] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:44:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19bb22a1-0594-497d-b25c-889b4c5f00a3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLw3LEh0sn-3F5dkns60rFvHe=0kKV7WCL9GPeCRP3Pdg@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/20/26 2:49 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 1:25 PM Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Okay, doing it separately is better I guess, I will wait for your
>> patches to land and then resend the arm64 support.
> Just combine them into one patchset, so that CI tests it all together.
Okay, will do.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-19 16:33 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/17] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/17] bpf: Remove unused parameter from check_map_kptr_access() Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/17] bpf: Refactor to avoid redundant calculation of bpf_reg_state Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/17] bpf: Refactor to handle memory and size together Yonghong Song
2026-04-20 23:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-21 4:04 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/17] bpf: Prepare verifier logs for upcoming kfunc stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 0:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-21 4:06 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 6:07 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 13:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-21 15:41 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 15:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-21 16:37 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:24 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/17] bpf: Introduce bpf register BPF_REG_PARAMS Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-19 18:14 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/17] bpf: Reuse MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS for maximum number of arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/17] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 19:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-20 4:35 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 0:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-21 4:15 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/17] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 18:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-20 4:23 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/17] bpf: Track r11 registers in const_fold and liveness Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/17] bpf: Prepare architecture JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/17] bpf: Enable r11 based insns Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/17] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 17:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-19 18:18 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/17] bpf: Reject stack arguments if tail call reachable Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 17:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-19 18:20 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 14/17] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 17:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-19 18:55 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 15/17] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 17:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-20 5:52 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 16/17] selftests/bpf: Add tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 16:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 17/17] selftests/bpf: Add verifier " Yonghong Song
2026-04-19 17:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-20 6:14 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-20 15:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/17] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-20 20:22 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-20 20:25 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-20 21:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-20 23:44 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19bb22a1-0594-497d-b25c-889b4c5f00a3@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox