From: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <Kernel-team@fb.com>, Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] libbpf: Add "map_extra" as a per-map-type extra flag
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:21:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211006222103.3631981-3-joannekoong@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211006222103.3631981-1-joannekoong@fb.com>
This patch adds the libbpf infrastructure for supporting a
per-map-type "map_extra" field, whose definition will be
idiosyncratic depending on map type.
For example, for the bitset map, the lower 4 bits of map_extra
is used to denote the number of hash functions.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 1 +
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 1 +
tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 1 +
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 4 ++++
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 2 ++
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 4 +++-
9 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index b40fa1a72a75..a6f225e9c95a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5639,6 +5639,7 @@ struct bpf_map_info {
__u32 btf_id;
__u32 btf_key_type_id;
__u32 btf_value_type_id;
+ __u32 map_extra;
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
struct bpf_btf_info {
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index b40fa1a72a75..a6f225e9c95a 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5639,6 +5639,7 @@ struct bpf_map_info {
__u32 btf_id;
__u32 btf_key_type_id;
__u32 btf_value_type_id;
+ __u32 map_extra;
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
struct bpf_btf_info {
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 7d1741ceaa32..41e3e85e7789 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ int bpf_create_map_xattr(const struct bpf_create_map_attr *create_attr)
attr.btf_key_type_id = create_attr->btf_key_type_id;
attr.btf_value_type_id = create_attr->btf_value_type_id;
attr.map_ifindex = create_attr->map_ifindex;
+ attr.map_extra = create_attr->map_extra;
if (attr.map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS)
attr.btf_vmlinux_value_type_id =
create_attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
index 6fffb3cdf39b..c4049f2d63cc 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct bpf_create_map_attr {
__u32 inner_map_fd;
__u32 btf_vmlinux_value_type_id;
};
+ __u32 map_extra;
};
LIBBPF_API int
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
index 963b1060d944..bce5a0090f3f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def {
unsigned int value_size;
unsigned int max_entries;
unsigned int map_flags;
+ unsigned int map_extra;
};
enum libbpf_pin_type {
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index ed313fd491bd..12a9ecd45a78 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -2274,6 +2274,10 @@ int parse_btf_map_def(const char *map_name, struct btf *btf,
}
map_def->pinning = val;
map_def->parts |= MAP_DEF_PINNING;
+ } else if (strcmp(name, "map_extra") == 0) {
+ if (!get_map_field_int(map_name, btf, m, &map_def->map_extra))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ map_def->parts |= MAP_DEF_MAP_EXTRA;
} else {
if (strict) {
pr_warn("map '%s': unknown field '%s'.\n", map_name, name);
@@ -2298,6 +2302,7 @@ static void fill_map_from_def(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf_map_def *def
map->def.value_size = def->value_size;
map->def.max_entries = def->max_entries;
map->def.map_flags = def->map_flags;
+ map->def.map_extra = def->map_extra;
map->numa_node = def->numa_node;
map->btf_key_type_id = def->key_type_id;
@@ -2322,6 +2327,8 @@ static void fill_map_from_def(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf_map_def *def
pr_debug("map '%s': found max_entries = %u.\n", map->name, def->max_entries);
if (def->parts & MAP_DEF_MAP_FLAGS)
pr_debug("map '%s': found map_flags = %u.\n", map->name, def->map_flags);
+ if (def->parts & MAP_DEF_MAP_EXTRA)
+ pr_debug("map '%s': found map_extra = %u.\n", map->name, def->map_extra);
if (def->parts & MAP_DEF_PINNING)
pr_debug("map '%s': found pinning = %u.\n", map->name, def->pinning);
if (def->parts & MAP_DEF_NUMA_NODE)
@@ -4017,6 +4024,7 @@ int bpf_map__reuse_fd(struct bpf_map *map, int fd)
map->def.value_size = info.value_size;
map->def.max_entries = info.max_entries;
map->def.map_flags = info.map_flags;
+ map->def.map_extra = info.map_extra;
map->btf_key_type_id = info.btf_key_type_id;
map->btf_value_type_id = info.btf_value_type_id;
map->reused = true;
@@ -4534,7 +4542,8 @@ static bool map_is_reuse_compat(const struct bpf_map *map, int map_fd)
map_info.key_size == map->def.key_size &&
map_info.value_size == map->def.value_size &&
map_info.max_entries == map->def.max_entries &&
- map_info.map_flags == map->def.map_flags);
+ map_info.map_flags == map->def.map_flags &&
+ map_info.map_extra == map->def.map_extra);
}
static int
@@ -4631,6 +4640,7 @@ static int bpf_object__create_map(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_map *map, b
create_attr.key_size = def->key_size;
create_attr.value_size = def->value_size;
create_attr.numa_node = map->numa_node;
+ create_attr.map_extra = def->map_extra;
if (def->type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY && !def->max_entries) {
int nr_cpus;
@@ -8637,6 +8647,19 @@ int bpf_map__set_map_flags(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 flags)
return 0;
}
+__u32 bpf_map__map_extra(const struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+ return map->def.map_extra;
+}
+
+int bpf_map__set_map_extra(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 map_extra)
+{
+ if (map->fd >= 0)
+ return libbpf_err(-EBUSY);
+ map->def.map_extra = map_extra;
+ return 0;
+}
+
__u32 bpf_map__numa_node(const struct bpf_map *map)
{
return map->numa_node;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 89ca9c83ed4e..55e8dfe6f3e1 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -486,6 +486,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def {
unsigned int value_size;
unsigned int max_entries;
unsigned int map_flags;
+ unsigned int map_extra;
};
/**
@@ -562,6 +563,9 @@ LIBBPF_API __u32 bpf_map__btf_value_type_id(const struct bpf_map *map);
/* get/set map if_index */
LIBBPF_API __u32 bpf_map__ifindex(const struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__set_ifindex(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 ifindex);
+/* get/set map map_extra flags */
+LIBBPF_API __u32 bpf_map__map_extra(const struct bpf_map *map);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__set_map_extra(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 map_extra);
typedef void (*bpf_map_clear_priv_t)(struct bpf_map *, void *);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__set_priv(struct bpf_map *map, void *priv,
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index f270d25e4af3..308378b3f20b 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -395,4 +395,6 @@ LIBBPF_0.6.0 {
bpf_object__prev_program;
btf__add_btf;
btf__add_tag;
+ bpf_map__map_extra;
+ bpf_map__set_map_extra;
} LIBBPF_0.5.0;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
index f7fd3944d46d..188db854d9c2 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
@@ -193,8 +193,9 @@ enum map_def_parts {
MAP_DEF_NUMA_NODE = 0x080,
MAP_DEF_PINNING = 0x100,
MAP_DEF_INNER_MAP = 0x200,
+ MAP_DEF_MAP_EXTRA = 0x400,
- MAP_DEF_ALL = 0x3ff, /* combination of all above */
+ MAP_DEF_ALL = 0x7ff, /* combination of all above */
};
struct btf_map_def {
@@ -208,6 +209,7 @@ struct btf_map_def {
__u32 map_flags;
__u32 numa_node;
__u32 pinning;
+ __u32 map_extra;
};
int parse_btf_map_def(const char *map_name, struct btf *btf,
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-06 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-06 22:20 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] Implement bitset maps, with bloom filter Joanne Koong
2021-10-06 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bitset map with bloom filter capabilities Joanne Koong
2021-10-07 14:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-10-07 21:59 ` Joanne Koong
2021-10-08 21:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-10-08 23:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-09 13:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-10-12 3:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-12 12:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-10-12 22:46 ` Joanne Koong
2021-10-12 23:25 ` Zvi Effron
2021-10-13 1:17 ` Joanne Koong
2021-10-13 4:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-10-13 0:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-10-13 4:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-10-19 23:53 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-08 23:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-08 23:24 ` Zvi Effron
2021-10-09 0:16 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-10-06 22:21 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
2021-10-08 23:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] libbpf: Add "map_extra" as a per-map-type extra flag Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-20 21:08 ` Joanne Koong
2021-10-20 21:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-21 20:14 ` Joanne Koong
2021-10-21 21:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-09 2:12 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-06 22:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/5] selftests/bpf: Add bitset map test cases Joanne Koong
2021-10-06 22:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/5] bpf/benchs: Add benchmark tests for bloom filter throughput + false positive Joanne Koong
2021-10-06 22:35 ` Joanne Koong
2021-10-09 2:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-15 23:35 ` Joanne Koong
2021-10-20 0:46 ` Joanne Koong
2021-10-09 2:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-06 22:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/5] bpf/benchs: Add benchmarks for comparing hashmap lookups w/ vs. w/out bloom filter Joanne Koong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211006222103.3631981-3-joannekoong@fb.com \
--to=joannekoong@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox