From: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
jgross@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, peterz@infradead.org,
acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
ajay.kaher@broadcom.com, alexey.amakhalov@broadcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
luto@kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, kys@microsoft.com,
haiyangz@microsoft.com, decui@microsoft.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 08/15] x86/cpufeatures: Add a CPU feature bit for MSR immediate form instructions
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 01:22:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250331082251.3171276-9-xin@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250331082251.3171276-1-xin@zytor.com>
The immediate form of MSR access instructions are primarily motivated
by performance, not code size: by having the MSR number in an immediate,
it is available *much* earlier in the pipeline, which allows the
hardware much more leeway about how a particular MSR is handled.
Use a scattered CPU feature bit for MSR immediate form instructions.
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 19 ++++++++++---------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index 6c2c152d8a67..a742a3d34712 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -472,15 +472,16 @@
*
* Reuse free bits when adding new feature flags!
*/
-#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_PMC_FREEZE (21*32+ 0) /* "amd_lbr_pmc_freeze" AMD LBR and PMC Freeze */
-#define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP (21*32+ 1) /* Clear branch history at syscall entry using SW loop */
-#define X86_FEATURE_BHI_CTRL (21*32+ 2) /* BHI_DIS_S HW control available */
-#define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW (21*32+ 3) /* BHI_DIS_S HW control enabled */
-#define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP_ON_VMEXIT (21*32+ 4) /* Clear branch history at vmexit using SW loop */
-#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_FAST_CPPC (21*32 + 5) /* Fast CPPC */
-#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_HETEROGENEOUS_CORES (21*32 + 6) /* Heterogeneous Core Topology */
-#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS (21*32 + 7) /* Workload Classification */
-#define X86_FEATURE_PREFER_YMM (21*32 + 8) /* Avoid ZMM registers due to downclocking */
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_PMC_FREEZE (21*32+ 0) /* "amd_lbr_pmc_freeze" AMD LBR and PMC Freeze */
+#define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP (21*32+ 1) /* Clear branch history at syscall entry using SW loop */
+#define X86_FEATURE_BHI_CTRL (21*32+ 2) /* BHI_DIS_S HW control available */
+#define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW (21*32+ 3) /* BHI_DIS_S HW control enabled */
+#define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP_ON_VMEXIT (21*32+ 4) /* Clear branch history at vmexit using SW loop */
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_FAST_CPPC (21*32+ 5) /* Fast CPPC */
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_HETEROGENEOUS_CORES (21*32+ 6) /* Heterogeneous Core Topology */
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS (21*32+ 7) /* Workload Classification */
+#define X86_FEATURE_PREFER_YMM (21*32+ 8) /* Avoid ZMM registers due to downclocking */
+#define X86_FEATURE_MSR_IMM (21*32+ 9) /* MSR immediate form instructions */
/*
* BUG word(s)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
index 16f3ca30626a..9eda656e9793 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
{ X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF, CPUID_ECX, 0, 0x00000006, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_EPB, CPUID_ECX, 3, 0x00000006, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PPIN, CPUID_EBX, 0, 0x00000007, 1 },
+ { X86_FEATURE_MSR_IMM, CPUID_ECX, 5, 0x00000007, 1 },
{ X86_FEATURE_RRSBA_CTRL, CPUID_EDX, 2, 0x00000007, 2 },
{ X86_FEATURE_BHI_CTRL, CPUID_EDX, 4, 0x00000007, 2 },
{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC, CPUID_EDX, 1, 0x0000000f, 0 },
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-31 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-31 8:22 [RFC PATCH v1 00/15] MSR refactor with new MSR instructions support Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/15] x86/msr: Replace __wrmsr() with native_wrmsrl() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-31 20:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-01 5:53 ` Xin Li
2025-04-02 15:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-02 15:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-09 19:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-09 19:56 ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-09 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-01 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-02 3:45 ` Xin Li
2025-04-02 4:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-02 4:57 ` Xin Li
2025-04-08 17:34 ` Xin Li
2025-04-03 5:09 ` Xin Li
2025-04-03 6:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-09 19:17 ` [PATCH] x86/msr: Standardize on 'u32' MSR indices in <asm/msr.h> Ingo Molnar
2025-03-31 21:45 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/15] x86/msr: Replace __wrmsr() with native_wrmsrl() Andrew Cooper
2025-04-01 5:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-01 5:29 ` Xin Li
2025-04-03 7:13 ` Xin Li
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/15] x86/msr: Replace __rdmsr() with native_rdmsrl() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/15] x86/msr: Simplify pmu_msr_{read,write}() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/15] x86/msr: Let pv_cpu_ops.write_msr{_safe}() take an u64 instead of two u32 Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/15] x86/msr: Replace wrmsr(msr, low, 0) with wrmsrl(msr, value) Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/15] x86/msr: Remove MSR write APIs that take the MSR value in two u32 arguments Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/15] x86/msr: Remove pmu_msr_{read,write}() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` Xin Li (Intel) [this message]
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/15] x86/opcode: Add immediate form MSR instructions to x86-opcode-map Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/15] KVM: VMX: Use WRMSRNS or its immediate form when available Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 20:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2025-03-31 20:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-31 20:41 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-03-31 20:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-31 20:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-10 23:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-11 16:18 ` Xin Li
2025-04-11 20:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-12 4:28 ` Xin Li
2025-04-11 21:12 ` Jim Mattson
2025-04-12 4:32 ` Xin Li
2025-04-12 23:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-14 17:48 ` Xin Li
2025-04-15 6:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-15 17:06 ` Xin Li
2025-04-15 17:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/15] x86/extable: Implement EX_TYPE_FUNC_REWIND Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/15] x86/msr: Use the alternatives mechanism to write MSR Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/15] x86/msr: Use the alternatives mechanism to read MSR Xin Li (Intel)
2025-04-14 17:13 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-04-17 11:10 ` Xin Li
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/15] x86/extable: Add support for the immediate form MSR instructions Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-31 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/15] x86/msr: Move the ARGS macros after the MSR read/write APIs Xin Li (Intel)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250331082251.3171276-9-xin@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.amakhalov@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox