public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>, Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: Register and unregister a struct_ops by their bpf_links.
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:38:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64d1219c-3d07-733a-17cc-17bb8fd27827@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28a01a8a-77d2-dcdc-eda4-a6ff7c7b54c0@gmail.com>

On 2/16/23 8:42 AM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>>> @@ -638,6 +647,8 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union 
>>> bpf_attr *attr)
>>>       set_vm_flush_reset_perms(st_map->image);
>>>       bpf_map_init_from_attr(map, attr);
>>> +    map->map_flags |= attr->map_flags & BPF_F_LINK;
>>
>> This should have already been done in bpf_map_init_from_attr().
> 
> bpf_map_init_from_attr() will filter out all flags except BPF_F_RDONLY & 
> BPF_F_WRONLY.

should be the opposite:

static u32 bpf_map_flags_retain_permanent(u32 flags)
{
	/* Some map creation flags are not tied to the map object but
          * rather to the map fd instead, so they have no meaning upon
          * map object inspection since multiple file descriptors with
          * different (access) properties can exist here. Thus, given
          * this has zero meaning for the map itself, lets clear these
          * from here.
          */
	return flags & ~(BPF_F_RDONLY | BPF_F_WRONLY);
}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-16 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-14 22:17 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] Transit between BPF TCP congestion controls Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Create links for BPF struct_ops maps Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15  0:26   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-15  2:39   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:04     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 18:44       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 20:24         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 21:28           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-15 20:30       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-15 20:55         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 22:58   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 17:59     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] net: Update an existing TCP congestion control algorithm Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15  2:43   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:15     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: Register and unregister a struct_ops by their bpf_links Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15  2:53   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:29     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16  0:37   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 16:42     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:38       ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-02-17 22:17         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15  2:58   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:44     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 18:48       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 22:20         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:40   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-16 22:59     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-18  0:05     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-18  1:08       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] bpf: Update the struct_ops of a bpf_link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16  1:02   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 19:17     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 19:40       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] libbpf: Update a bpf_link with another struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-18  0:22     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-18  1:10       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-21 22:20         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:50   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-18  0:23     ` Kui-Feng Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64d1219c-3d07-733a-17cc-17bb8fd27827@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox