From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] net: Update an existing TCP congestion control algorithm.
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:15:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91c8b5e3-ac55-3b01-9904-43587bedd319@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+xG2DNzFt2Uq+8F@google.com>
On 2/14/23 18:43, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 02/14, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>> This feature lets you immediately transition to another congestion
>> control algorithm or implementation with the same name. Once a name
>> is updated, new connections will apply this new algorithm.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
>> include/net/tcp.h | 2 ++
>> net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c | 6 ++++++
>> net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 6 ++++++
>> net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> index 13683584b071..5fe39f56a760 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -1450,6 +1450,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
>> void *kdata, const void *udata);
>> int (*reg)(void *kdata);
>> void (*unreg)(void *kdata);
>> + int (*update)(void *kdata, void *old_kdata);
>> const struct btf_type *type;
>> const struct btf_type *value_type;
>> const char *name;
>> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
>> index db9f828e9d1e..239cc0e2639c 100644
>> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
>> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
>> @@ -1117,6 +1117,8 @@ struct tcp_congestion_ops {
>
>> int tcp_register_congestion_control(struct tcp_congestion_ops *type);
>> void tcp_unregister_congestion_control(struct tcp_congestion_ops
>> *type);
>> +int tcp_update_congestion_control(struct tcp_congestion_ops *type,
>> + struct tcp_congestion_ops *old_type);
>
>> void tcp_assign_congestion_control(struct sock *sk);
>> void tcp_init_congestion_control(struct sock *sk);
>> diff --git a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
>> b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
>> index ff4f89a2b02a..158f14e240d0 100644
>> --- a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
>> +++ b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
>> @@ -222,12 +222,18 @@ static void bpf_dummy_unreg(void *kdata)
>> {
>> }
>
>> +static int bpf_dummy_update(void *kdata, void *old_kdata)
>> +{
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> +
>> struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_bpf_dummy_ops = {
>> .verifier_ops = &bpf_dummy_verifier_ops,
>> .init = bpf_dummy_init,
>> .check_member = bpf_dummy_ops_check_member,
>> .init_member = bpf_dummy_init_member,
>> .reg = bpf_dummy_reg,
>> + .update = bpf_dummy_update,
>> .unreg = bpf_dummy_unreg,
>> .name = "bpf_dummy_ops",
>> };
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
>> index 13fc0c185cd9..66ce5fadfe42 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
>> @@ -266,10 +266,16 @@ static void bpf_tcp_ca_unreg(void *kdata)
>> tcp_unregister_congestion_control(kdata);
>> }
>
>> +static int bpf_tcp_ca_update(void *kdata, void *old_kdata)
>> +{
>> + return tcp_update_congestion_control(kdata, old_kdata);
>> +}
>> +
>> struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_tcp_congestion_ops = {
>> .verifier_ops = &bpf_tcp_ca_verifier_ops,
>> .reg = bpf_tcp_ca_reg,
>> .unreg = bpf_tcp_ca_unreg,
>> + .update = bpf_tcp_ca_update,
>> .check_member = bpf_tcp_ca_check_member,
>> .init_member = bpf_tcp_ca_init_member,
>> .init = bpf_tcp_ca_init,
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c
>> index db8b4b488c31..22fd7c12360e 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c
>> @@ -130,6 +130,45 @@ void tcp_unregister_congestion_control(struct
>> tcp_congestion_ops *ca)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_unregister_congestion_control);
>
>> +/* Replace a registered old ca with a new one.
>> + *
>> + * The new ca must have the same name as the old one, that has been
>> + * registered.
>> + */
>> +int tcp_update_congestion_control(struct tcp_congestion_ops *ca,
>> struct tcp_congestion_ops *old_ca)
>> +{
>> + struct tcp_congestion_ops *existing;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>
> [..]
>
>> + /* all algorithms must implement these */
>> + if (!ca->ssthresh || !ca->undo_cwnd ||
>> + !(ca->cong_avoid || ca->cong_control)) {
>> + pr_err("%s does not implement required ops\n", old_ca->name);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ca->key = jhash(ca->name, sizeof(ca->name), strlen(ca->name));
>
> Can we have this as some common _validate method to avoid copy-paste
> from tcp_register_congestion_control.
Sure!
>
> Or, even better, can we can since function handle both cases?
>
> tcp_register_congestion_control(ca, old_ca);
> - when old_ca == NULL -> register
> - when old_ca != NULL -> try to update
We use this function in a lot of different places. To make it easier, I
added a new function instead of changing the old one.
>
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&tcp_cong_list_lock);
>> + existing = tcp_ca_find_key(ca->key);
>> + if (ca->key == TCP_CA_UNSPEC || !existing ||
>> strcmp(existing->name, ca->name)) {
>> + pr_notice("%s not registered or non-unique key\n",
>> + ca->name);
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + } else if (existing != old_ca) {
>> + pr_notice("invalid old congestion control algorithm to
>> replace\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + } else {
>> + list_del_rcu(&existing->list);
>> + list_add_tail_rcu(&ca->list, &tcp_cong_list);
>> + pr_debug("%s updated\n", ca->name);
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock(&tcp_cong_list_lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_update_congestion_control);
>> +
>> u32 tcp_ca_get_key_by_name(struct net *net, const char *name, bool
>> *ecn_ca)
>> {
>> const struct tcp_congestion_ops *ca;
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 22:17 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] Transit between BPF TCP congestion controls Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Create links for BPF struct_ops maps Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 0:26 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-15 2:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:04 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 18:44 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 20:24 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 21:28 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-15 20:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-15 20:55 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 22:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 17:59 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] net: Update an existing TCP congestion control algorithm Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 2:43 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:15 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: Register and unregister a struct_ops by their bpf_links Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 2:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:29 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 0:37 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 16:42 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-17 22:17 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 2:58 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:44 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 18:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 22:20 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:40 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-16 22:59 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-18 0:05 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-18 1:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] bpf: Update the struct_ops of a bpf_link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 1:02 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 19:17 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 19:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] libbpf: Update a bpf_link with another struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-18 0:22 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-18 1:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-21 22:20 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-18 0:23 ` Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91c8b5e3-ac55-3b01-9904-43587bedd319@gmail.com \
--to=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox