From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops().
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:44:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7149cfe4-7ae4-a8e9-6f85-38e488080f28@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+xKOq4gW58IDMWE@google.com>
On 2/14/23 18:58, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 02/14, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>> bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() was creating a dummy bpf_link as a
>> placeholder, but now it is constructing an authentic one by calling
>> bpf_link_create() if the map has the BPF_F_LINK flag.
>
>> You can flag a struct_ops map with BPF_F_LINK by calling
>> bpf_map__set_map_flags().
>
>> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
>> ---
>> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> index 75ed95b7e455..1eff6a03ddd9 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> @@ -11430,29 +11430,41 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach(const
>> struct bpf_program *prog)
>> return link;
>> }
>
>> +struct bpf_link_struct_ops_map {
>> + struct bpf_link link;
>> + int map_fd;
>> +};
>
> Ah, ok, now you're adding bpf_link_struct_ops_map. I guess I'm now
> confused why you haven't done it in the first patch :-/
Just won't to mix the libbpf part and kernel part in one patch.
>
> And what are these fake bpf_links? Can you share more about it means?
For the next version, I will detail it in the commit log. In a nutshell,
before this point, there was no bpf_link for struct_ops. Libbpf
attempted to create an equivalent interface to other BPF programs by
providing a simulated bpf_link instead of a true one from the kernel;
that fake bpf_link stores FDs associated with struct_ops maps rather
than real bpf_links.
>
>> +
>> static int bpf_link__detach_struct_ops(struct bpf_link *link)
>> {
>> + struct bpf_link_struct_ops_map *st_link;
>> __u32 zero = 0;
>
>> - if (bpf_map_delete_elem(link->fd, &zero))
>> + st_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_link_struct_ops_map, link);
>> +
>> + if (st_link->map_fd < 0) {
>> + /* Fake bpf_link */
>> + if (bpf_map_delete_elem(link->fd, &zero))
>> + return -errno;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (bpf_map_delete_elem(st_link->map_fd, &zero))
>> + return -errno;
>> +
>> + if (close(link->fd))
>> return -errno;
>
>> return 0;
>> }
>
>> -struct bpf_link *bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(const struct bpf_map *map)
>> +/*
>> + * Update the map with the prepared vdata.
>> + */
>> +static int bpf_map__update_vdata(const struct bpf_map *map)
>> {
>> struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
>> - struct bpf_link *link;
>> __u32 i, zero = 0;
>> - int err;
>> -
>> - if (!bpf_map__is_struct_ops(map) || map->fd == -1)
>> - return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
>> -
>> - link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
>> - if (!link)
>> - return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
>
>> st_ops = map->st_ops;
>> for (i = 0; i < btf_vlen(st_ops->type); i++) {
>> @@ -11468,17 +11480,48 @@ struct bpf_link
>> *bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(const struct bpf_map *map)
>> *(unsigned long *)kern_data = prog_fd;
>> }
>
>> - err = bpf_map_update_elem(map->fd, &zero, st_ops->kern_vdata, 0);
>> + return bpf_map_update_elem(map->fd, &zero, st_ops->kern_vdata, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct bpf_link *bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(const struct bpf_map *map)
>> +{
>> + struct bpf_link_struct_ops_map *link;
>> + int err, fd;
>> +
>> + if (!bpf_map__is_struct_ops(map) || map->fd == -1)
>> + return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> + link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
>> + if (!link)
>> + return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> + err = bpf_map__update_vdata(map);
>> if (err) {
>> err = -errno;
>> free(link);
>> return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
>> }
>
>> - link->detach = bpf_link__detach_struct_ops;
>> - link->fd = map->fd;
>> + link->link.detach = bpf_link__detach_struct_ops;
>
>> - return link;
>> + if (!(map->def.map_flags & BPF_F_LINK)) {
>> + /* Fake bpf_link */
>> + link->link.fd = map->fd;
>> + link->map_fd = -1;
>> + return &link->link;
>> + }
>> +
>> + fd = bpf_link_create(map->fd, -1, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_MAP, NULL);
>> + if (fd < 0) {
>> + err = -errno;
>> + free(link);
>> + return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
>> + }
>> +
>> + link->link.fd = fd;
>> + link->map_fd = map->fd;
>> +
>> + return &link->link;
>> }
>
>> typedef enum bpf_perf_event_ret (*bpf_perf_event_print_t)(struct
>> perf_event_header *hdr,
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 22:17 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] Transit between BPF TCP congestion controls Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Create links for BPF struct_ops maps Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 0:26 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-15 2:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:04 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 18:44 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 20:24 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 21:28 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-15 20:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-15 20:55 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 22:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 17:59 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] net: Update an existing TCP congestion control algorithm Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 2:43 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:15 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: Register and unregister a struct_ops by their bpf_links Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 2:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:29 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 0:37 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 16:42 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-17 22:17 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 2:58 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:44 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2023-02-15 18:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 22:20 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:40 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-16 22:59 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-18 0:05 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-18 1:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] bpf: Update the struct_ops of a bpf_link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 1:02 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 19:17 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 19:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] libbpf: Update a bpf_link with another struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-18 0:22 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-18 1:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-21 22:20 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-18 0:23 ` Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7149cfe4-7ae4-a8e9-6f85-38e488080f28@gmail.com \
--to=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox