BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] [no_merge] selftests/bpf: Benchmark runtime performance with private stack
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 19:21:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66b5c1ea-d945-4d72-8003-e807452918fa@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJ_-FR45o89SWJWZPD4+A+AEArJf1Pjw41=9f0+Ujzg+g@mail.gmail.com>


On 7/18/24 5:36 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 2:44 PM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>>>     $ perf record -- ./bench -w3 -d10 -a --nr-batch-iters=4096 private-stack
>>>       18.94%  bench                                              [k]
>>>       16.88%  bench    bpf_prog_bcf7977d3b93787c_func1           [k] bpf_prog_bcf7977d3b93787c_func1
>>>       15.77%  bench    bpf_trampoline_6442522961                 [k]
> ...
>
>>> NOTE: I tried 6.4 perf and 6.10 perf, both of which have issues. I will investigate this further.
>> I tried with perf built with latest bpf-next and with no-private-stack, the issue still
>> exists. Will debug more.
> Try this fix:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240714065533.1112616-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/

It does fix the problem. The 'perf report' for private-stack flavor:

   18.94%  bench    bpf_prog_71f1b7d5309b304a_bench_trigger_fentry_batch  [k] bpf_prog_71f1b7d5309b304a_bench_trigger_fentry_batch
   16.50%  bench    bpf_prog_bcf7977d3b93787c_func1                       [k] bpf_prog_bcf7977d3b93787c_func1
   15.75%  bench    bpf_trampoline_6442522961                             [k] bpf_trampoline_6442522961
   11.72%  bench    [kernel.vmlinux]                                      [k] migrate_enable
   11.63%  bench    [kernel.vmlinux]                                      [k] __bpf_prog_enter_recur
   11.37%  bench    [kernel.vmlinux]                                      [k] __bpf_prog_exit_recur
    6.17%  bench    [kernel.vmlinux]                                      [k] migrate_disable
    3.59%  bench    bpf_prog_d9703036495d54b0_trigger_driver              [k] bpf_prog_d9703036495d54b0_trigger_driver
    3.51%  bench    [kernel.vmlinux]                                      [k] bpf_get_numa_node_id
    0.05%  bench    bench                                                 [.] bpf_prog_test_run_opts

>
> btw you were cc-ed on it. your @ fb goes to spam ? ;)

It is in my inbox. Sadly I skipped it since it is for perf system and I focused on
several of my patches in the last few days.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-19  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-18 20:51 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs Yonghong Song
2024-07-18 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] [no_merge] selftests/bpf: Benchmark runtime performance with private stack Yonghong Song
2024-07-18 21:44   ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-18 21:59     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-07-19  3:01       ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-19  0:36     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-19  2:21       ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-07-20  0:14   ` bot+bpf-ci
2024-07-20  1:08   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-22 16:33     ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-20  3:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-22 16:43   ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-24  5:08     ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-24 16:54       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-24 17:56         ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-22 20:57   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-23  1:05     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-23  3:26       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-24  3:17         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-24  4:06           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-24  4:46             ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-24  4:32           ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-23  5:30       ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-23  7:02         ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-22  3:33 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-22 16:54   ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-22 17:53     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-22 17:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-22 18:22     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-22 20:08       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-24 21:28   ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-25  4:55     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-25 17:20       ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66b5c1ea-d945-4d72-8003-e807452918fa@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox