From: Gergely Madarasz <gorgo@broadband.hu>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [Bridge] Re: tg3 bridge problems
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:45:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050110154506.GJ7529@thunderchild.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E299D4.2010605@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:05:56AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I've got a very strange problem. Lately I've been setting up my linux
> >servers for network (layer2) redundancy with a bridge interface containing
> >two ethernet interfaces connecting to two switches. So far I didn't have
> >any problems with it, but now a very strange thing happens with a new
> >server I'm installing. The server is an ibm x346 having two onboard
> >BCM5721 cards, the switches are cisco 3550, and I've tested with kernel
> >versions 2.6.10 and 2.4.28.
> >
> >The bpdu's from the cisco switches simply cannot be seen on the server,
> >causing loops in l2 traffic. I've tested with sticking a hub between the
> >c3550 and the server, the switch sends out the bpdu's, but they are not
> >seen by linux (running tethereal). This happens only on eth0, on eth1
> >everything seems fine. Any IP traffic on eth0 goes through, no packet
> >loss, no errors.
> >
> >And something even more strange: if I do an
> >ifconfig eth0 0 up; brctl addif br0 eth0;
> >it seems to be working fine, if I do it the other way
> >round, then the bpdu's sent by the switches are lost somewhere.
> >
> >Considering all these, the problem seems to me a strange interaction
> >between the bridge driver, the tg3 driver and the hardware in question.
>
> It looks to me like either order should work just fine, as long as the
> IFF_PROMISC flag isn't cleared when you bring up the interface. Is
> IF_PROMISC clear in ifconfig after you issue your ifconfig eth0 up command?
ifconfig has never showed PROMISC on either of my bridged servers.
ip shows it though. I noticed this before but couldn't find the reason and
didn't seem important.
This is on a machine with working bridge:
# ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:09:6B:49:89:80
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
...
# ip link list eth0
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:09:6b:49:89:80 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
And this is on the problematic machine:
# ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0D:60:55:3B:02
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
....
# ip addr list eth0
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0d:60:55:3b:02 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
And even if didn't get promisc, tcpdump or tethereal would have made it
so, when I was looking for the bpdu packets. Tethereal shows only this:
0.000000 00:0d:60:55:3b:02 -> 01:80:c2:00:00:00 STP Conf. Root = 65535/00:0d:60:55:3b:02 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8001
Greg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-10 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 14:06 [Bridge] tg3 bridge problems Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 15:05 ` [Bridge] " Neil Horman
2005-01-10 15:45 ` Gergely Madarasz [this message]
2005-01-10 16:04 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 16:18 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 17:40 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:11 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:41 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:49 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:53 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 20:09 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 20:43 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 9:16 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 4:06 ` Paul Schulz
2005-01-11 8:52 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 12:36 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 12:58 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 13:12 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 14:07 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 20:19 ` dave
2005-01-12 9:21 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050110154506.GJ7529@thunderchild.debian.net \
--to=gorgo@broadband.hu \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox