Ethernet Bridge development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gergely Madarasz <gorgo@broadband.hu>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] Re: tg3 bridge problems
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:58:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050111125831.GD10074@thunderchild.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E3C868.5040605@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 07:36:56AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:36:46PM +1030, Paul Schulz wrote:
> >
> >>Greetings,
> >>
> >>This may be the problem that I have seen (and reported) previously...
> >>http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/archive/2004-02/msg00442.html
> >>
> >>One suggestion.. do a packet dump on an outgoing bridge port, and a 
> >>dump from a transmitting machine connected to the bridge. Compare the
> >>MD5 checksums.
> >
> >
> >Thanks for the idea, but it doesn't seem to help. I've modified the patch
> >to apply to my chipset revision (and added a debugging printk to make sure
> >I've hit the right chipset :)), but nothing really changed. I didn't
> >expect it to either, because this is not a transmit problem, but a
> >promiscuous receive problem of the driver/card.
> >
> >Greg
> >
> You know, there is a tg3_dump_state function that if 0-ed out at the 
> moment, which among other things dumps out the chips RX_MODE.  You could 
>  uncomment that function and tie it to a private ioctl which you could 
> call from user space.  That way you could compare the RX_MODE values in 
> a working and a failing environment. If they matched, you could be 
> reasonably sure it was a hardware issue, otherwise, you would know your 
> looking for a driver bug.

It seems they do not match:
failing: MAC_RX_MODE[00000002]
working: MAC_RX_MODE[00000102]

So this would point to a driver bug. To search for that, I added a printk
at each write to MAC_RX_MODE to see what is being set up. Every call was
fine, the last always being 0x102. Would it be possible that the buggy
hardware itself resets this register after a link change or something?

The following workaround patch made the problem disappear:

--- tg3.c~      2005-01-11 12:30:21.000000000 +0100
+++ tg3.c       2005-01-11 12:30:21.000000000 +0100
@@ -2803,6 +2803,8 @@
			sblk->status = SD_STATUS_UPDATED |
				(sblk->status & ~SD_STATUS_LINK_CHG);
			tg3_setup_phy(tp, 0);
+			tw32_f(MAC_RX_MODE, tp->rx_mode);
+			udelay(10);
		}
	}


So if I reset the rx_mode after the card has reported a link change,
promisc works fine. This workaround works on both machines, one having
rev 4001 cards, the other having rev 2003's.

Greg

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-11 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-10 14:06 [Bridge] tg3 bridge problems Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 15:05 ` [Bridge] " Neil Horman
2005-01-10 15:45   ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 16:04     ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 16:18       ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 17:40         ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:11           ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:41             ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:49               ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:53                 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 20:09                   ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 20:43                     ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11  9:16                       ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11  4:06                 ` Paul Schulz
2005-01-11  8:52                   ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 12:36                     ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 12:58                       ` Gergely Madarasz [this message]
2005-01-11 13:12                         ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 14:07                           ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 20:19                             ` dave
2005-01-12  9:21                               ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:34     ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050111125831.GD10074@thunderchild.debian.net \
    --to=gorgo@broadband.hu \
    --cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox