From: Gergely Madarasz <gorgo@broadband.hu>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [Bridge] Re: tg3 bridge problems
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:11:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050110191133.GM7529@thunderchild.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E2BE29.8090800@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:40:57PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:04:55AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> >>Strange. My concern was that the tg3 interface has its hardware reset
> >>whenever its set to be up, and part of that is a resetting of its
> >>receive mode. If for some reason IFF_PROMISC was cleared after you set
> >>it using brctl, the interface might be taken out of promisc mode. Do
> >>you have any iptables rules running that might drop bpdus?
> >
> >
> >No iptables rules az all. Btw iptables wouldn't prevent tcpdump from
> >seeing the packets, would it?
> >Could it be that the driver perhaps has a problem setting promisc mode
> >when resetting the hardware?
> >
> Not really sure about this. One experiment is worth a thousand guesses
> I suppose....... I'll try and let you know. :)
I did some other checks, like adding an explicit ifconfig eth0 promisc,
then looking at tcpdump output - I didn't see any stray packets like I
usually do, just ethernet broadcasts and unicasts to my mac, this also
points to a problem that the ethernet interface is actually not in
promisc, while the driver thinks it is.
And it is probably not a driver-only issue. I've got older machines with
tg3 running fine with bridge (with an older tg3 driver), and eth1 on the
same machine also runs fine. On another machine I tested today, an IBM
x326, the same thing happens - eth0 broken, eth1 fine. Would access to one
of these machines help? :)
Greg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-10 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 14:06 [Bridge] tg3 bridge problems Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 15:05 ` [Bridge] " Neil Horman
2005-01-10 15:45 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 16:04 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 16:18 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 17:40 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:11 ` Gergely Madarasz [this message]
2005-01-10 19:41 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:49 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:53 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 20:09 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 20:43 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 9:16 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 4:06 ` Paul Schulz
2005-01-11 8:52 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 12:36 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 12:58 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 13:12 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 14:07 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 20:19 ` dave
2005-01-12 9:21 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050110191133.GM7529@thunderchild.debian.net \
--to=gorgo@broadband.hu \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox