From: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
To: Gergely Madarasz <gorgo@broadband.hu>
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] Re: tg3 bridge problems
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:36:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E3C868.5040605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050111085216.GA10074@thunderchild.debian.net>
Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:36:46PM +1030, Paul Schulz wrote:
>
>>Greetings,
>>
>>This may be the problem that I have seen (and reported) previously...
>>http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/archive/2004-02/msg00442.html
>>
>>One suggestion.. do a packet dump on an outgoing bridge port, and a
>>dump from a transmitting machine connected to the bridge. Compare the
>>MD5 checksums.
>
>
> Thanks for the idea, but it doesn't seem to help. I've modified the patch
> to apply to my chipset revision (and added a debugging printk to make sure
> I've hit the right chipset :)), but nothing really changed. I didn't
> expect it to either, because this is not a transmit problem, but a
> promiscuous receive problem of the driver/card.
>
> Greg
>
You know, there is a tg3_dump_state function that if 0-ed out at the
moment, which among other things dumps out the chips RX_MODE. You could
uncomment that function and tie it to a private ioctl which you could
call from user space. That way you could compare the RX_MODE values in
a working and a failing environment. If they matched, you could be
reasonably sure it was a hardware issue, otherwise, you would know your
looking for a driver bug.
Neil
--
/***************************************************
*Neil Horman
*Software Engineer
*Red Hat, Inc.
*nhorman@redhat.com
*gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
*http://pgp.mit.edu
***************************************************/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-11 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 14:06 [Bridge] tg3 bridge problems Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 15:05 ` [Bridge] " Neil Horman
2005-01-10 15:45 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 16:04 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 16:18 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 17:40 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:11 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:41 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 19:49 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:53 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-10 20:09 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 20:43 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 9:16 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 4:06 ` Paul Schulz
2005-01-11 8:52 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 12:36 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2005-01-11 12:58 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 13:12 ` Neil Horman
2005-01-11 14:07 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-11 20:19 ` dave
2005-01-12 9:21 ` Gergely Madarasz
2005-01-10 19:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41E3C868.5040605@redhat.com \
--to=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=gorgo@broadband.hu \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox