* [Buildroot] Target rebuilding
@ 2013-01-17 11:04 Jérôme Pouiller
2013-01-17 13:27 ` Stephan Hoffmann
2013-01-19 16:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Pouiller @ 2013-01-17 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello all,
It is handy to do tests directly in target/. But after some time, it is
necessary to make a new fresh target/ directory. The current procedure to do
this is:
* remove build/.root (or remove target/ if you want to throw all your work)
* remove build/*/.stamp_target_installed
* depending of you toolchain:
# remove stamps/ext-toolchain-installed (external)
# remove stamps/ct-ng-toolchain-installed (ctng)
# remove target/lib/libc.so.0 (buildroot)
* launch make
I think this process lacks of consistency. Idealy, this process should be:
rm -r target (depending if want to throw all your work)
rm build/*/.stamp_target_installed
make
I suggest following changes:
1. Move build/.root to stamps/. Since it is hidden, many user forget this
file exist.
2. All stamps files are in subdirectories of build/. I suggest to move
stamps/ to build/stamps/
3. Buildroot toolchain should create a stamp files to be uniform with other
toolchains. In add, target/lib/libc.so.0 never exists when PREFER_STATIC_LIB
is enable.
4. To be consistent stamps/*-toolchain-installed may be renamed
stamps/.stamp_target_installed or stamps/.stamp_toolchain_target_installed or
toolchain/.stamp_target_installed. We may add a README file to explain what is
purpose of this apparently empty directory.
5. stamps/ext-toolchain-installed currently copy libc in staging/ and in
target/. It may be splited in two rules: stamps/ext-toolchain-target-installed
and stamps/ext-toolchain-staging-installed.
What do you think about it?
Regards,
--
J?r?me Pouiller
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Target rebuilding
2013-01-17 11:04 [Buildroot] Target rebuilding Jérôme Pouiller
@ 2013-01-17 13:27 ` Stephan Hoffmann
2013-01-18 9:43 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-01-19 16:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Hoffmann @ 2013-01-17 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello J?r?me!
Am 17.01.2013 12:04, schrieb J?r?me Pouiller:
> Hello all,
>
> It is handy to do tests directly in target/. But after some time, it is
> necessary to make a new fresh target/ directory.
This topic comes up from time to time. Once upon a time I sent a patch
to introduce a "make target-clean" (
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-October/060484.html )
, but it does not seem that this feature can be implemented in a
reliable way, especially when libraries are removed from .config.
So for now I fear we have to stick to "make clean && make" if we want to
clean up our file system.
> The current procedure to do
> this is:
>
> * remove build/.root (or remove target/ if you want to throw all your work)
What's the use in removing the stamp file and keeping the target
directory? I think the whole proccedure is meant to chean up the target
file system, isn't it?
Regards
Stephan
> * remove build/*/.stamp_target_installed
> * depending of you toolchain:
> # remove stamps/ext-toolchain-installed (external)
> # remove stamps/ct-ng-toolchain-installed (ctng)
> # remove target/lib/libc.so.0 (buildroot)
> * launch make
>
> I think this process lacks of consistency. Idealy, this process should be:
> rm -r target (depending if want to throw all your work)
> rm build/*/.stamp_target_installed
> make
>
> I suggest following changes:
>
> 1. Move build/.root to stamps/. Since it is hidden, many user forget this
> file exist.
>
> 2. All stamps files are in subdirectories of build/. I suggest to move
> stamps/ to build/stamps/
>
> 3. Buildroot toolchain should create a stamp files to be uniform with other
> toolchains. In add, target/lib/libc.so.0 never exists when PREFER_STATIC_LIB
> is enable.
>
> 4. To be consistent stamps/*-toolchain-installed may be renamed
> stamps/.stamp_target_installed or stamps/.stamp_toolchain_target_installed or
> toolchain/.stamp_target_installed. We may add a README file to explain what is
> purpose of this apparently empty directory.
>
> 5. stamps/ext-toolchain-installed currently copy libc in staging/ and in
> target/. It may be splited in two rules: stamps/ext-toolchain-target-installed
> and stamps/ext-toolchain-staging-installed.
>
>
> What do you think about it?
>
>
> Regards,
>
--
reLinux - Stephan Hoffmann
Am Schmidtgrund 124 50765 K?ln
Tel. +49.221.95595-19 Fax: -64
www.reLinux.de sho at reLinux.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Target rebuilding
2013-01-17 13:27 ` Stephan Hoffmann
@ 2013-01-18 9:43 ` Jérôme Pouiller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Pouiller @ 2013-01-18 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello Stephan,
On Thursday 17 January 2013 14:27:46 Stephan Hoffmann wrote:
> Am 17.01.2013 12:04, schrieb J?r?me Pouiller:
> > It is handy to do tests directly in target/. But after some time, it is
> > necessary to make a new fresh target/ directory.
>
> This topic comes up from time to time. Once upon a time I sent a patch
> to introduce a "make target-clean" (
> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-October/060484.html )
> , but it does not seem that this feature can be implemented in a
> reliable way, especially when libraries are removed from .config.
I am agreee with this thread. Since we cannot prove correctness it is not a
good idea to give a target to this.
Nevertheless, in 90% of cases, I know I can rebuild target/ without recompile
everything and this "hack" allow to divide by 500 time to rebuild target/. I
would like to make this procedure easier to learn for users.
I asked myself if it was not possible to make this procedure more intuitive
without breaking everything. That why I suggest these small changes. Each of
them can be done independently.
IMHO these changes would make process more coherent and would bring a better
usage of Buildroot. But I understand it is subjective.
> So for now I fear we have to stick to "make clean && make" if we want to
> clean up our file system.
Sure. But, if it is the only answer I give, my interlocutor will reply me that
Buildroot is painful (which make me angry for all rest of the day).
> > The current procedure to do
> >
> > this is:
> >
> > * remove build/.root (or remove target/ if you want to throw all your
> > work)
>
> What's the use in removing the stamp file and keeping the target
> directory? I think the whole proccedure is meant to chean up the target
> file system, isn't it?
Right. It was mainly to point out "build/.root" is not an intuitive path.
[...]
> > I suggest following changes:
> > 1. Move build/.root to stamps/. Since it is hidden, many user forget this
> > file exist.
> >
> > 2. All stamps files are in subdirectories of build/. I suggest to move
> > stamps/ to build/stamps/
> >
> > 3. Buildroot toolchain should create a stamp files to be uniform with
> > other toolchains. In add, target/lib/libc.so.0 never exists when
> > PREFER_STATIC_LIB is enable.
> >
> > 4. To be consistent stamps/*-toolchain-installed may be renamed
> > stamps/.stamp_target_installed or stamps/.stamp_toolchain_target_installed
> > or toolchain/.stamp_target_installed. We may add a README file to explain
> > what is purpose of this apparently empty directory.
> >
> > 5. stamps/ext-toolchain-installed currently copy libc in staging/ and in
> > target/. It may be splited in two rules: stamps/ext-toolchain-target-
> > installed and stamps/ext-toolchain-staging-installed.
[...]
Regards,
--
J?r?me Pouiller
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Target rebuilding
2013-01-17 11:04 [Buildroot] Target rebuilding Jérôme Pouiller
2013-01-17 13:27 ` Stephan Hoffmann
@ 2013-01-19 16:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 14:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name Jérôme Pouiller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2013-01-19 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On 17/01/13 12:04, J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> It is handy to do tests directly in target/. But after some time, it is
> necessary to make a new fresh target/ directory. The current procedure to do
> this is:
>
> * remove build/.root (or remove target/ if you want to throw all your work)
> * remove build/*/.stamp_target_installed
> * depending of you toolchain:
> # remove stamps/ext-toolchain-installed (external)
> # remove stamps/ct-ng-toolchain-installed (ctng)
> # remove target/lib/libc.so.0 (buildroot)
> * launch make
>
> I think this process lacks of consistency. Idealy, this process should be:
> rm -r target (depending if want to throw all your work)
> rm build/*/.stamp_target_installed
> make
I agree that it lacks consistency, and I'm in favour of improving the
consistency of stamp files.
>
> I suggest following changes:
>
> 1. Move build/.root to stamps/. Since it is hidden, many user forget this
> file exist.
ACK.
>
> 2. All stamps files are in subdirectories of build/. I suggest to move
> stamps/ to build/stamps/
I'm not convinced that that improves the consistency. If build/.root
moves to stamps, than all directories in build/ are build directories.
That sounds like a good idea to me.
> 3. Buildroot toolchain should create a stamp files to be uniform with other
> toolchains. In add, target/lib/libc.so.0 never exists when PREFER_STATIC_LIB
> is enable.
ACK
Note that the buildroot toolchain is on the way out (though it will
probably take 3 more years before it's really gone), so don't put too
much effort into improving it.
> 4. To be consistent stamps/*-toolchain-installed may be renamed
> stamps/.stamp_target_installed or stamps/.stamp_toolchain_target_installed or
> toolchain/.stamp_target_installed. We may add a README file to explain what is
> purpose of this apparently empty directory.
I don't agree with this one. build/*/.stamp_* is stuff that is created
by the package infrastructure. The toolchain stuff is not in the package
infrastructure. So I wouldn't let it use the same pattern for stamp files.
> 5. stamps/ext-toolchain-installed currently copy libc in staging/ and in
> target/. It may be splited in two rules: stamps/ext-toolchain-target-installed
> and stamps/ext-toolchain-staging-installed.
It could be split, but what is the advantage of that?
> What do you think about it?
Let's see some patches! :-)
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-01-19 16:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
@ 2013-05-14 14:30 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-14 15:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Pouiller @ 2013-05-14 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
To be coherent with stamps used by toolchains, file $(BUILD)/.root is now named
$(STAMPS)/target-skeleton-installed.
Signed-off-by: J?r?me Pouiller <jezz@sysmic.org>
---
Makefile | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index a57975e..73a7c01 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -429,16 +429,17 @@ ifeq ($(BR2_ROOTFS_SKELETON_CUSTOM),y)
TARGET_SKELETON=$(BR2_ROOTFS_SKELETON_CUSTOM_PATH)
endif
-$(BUILD_DIR)/.root:
+$(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed:
mkdir -p $(TARGET_DIR)
rsync -a \
--exclude .empty --exclude .svn --exclude .git \
--exclude .hg --exclude=CVS --exclude '*~' \
$(TARGET_SKELETON)/ $(TARGET_DIR)/
cp support/misc/target-dir-warning.txt $(TARGET_DIR_WARNING_FILE)
+ mkdir -p $(STAMP_DIR)
touch $@
-$(TARGET_DIR): $(BUILD_DIR)/.root
+$(TARGET_DIR): $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed
STRIP_FIND_CMD = find $(TARGET_DIR)
ifneq (,$(call qstrip,$(BR2_STRIP_EXCLUDE_DIRS)))
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-05-14 14:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name Jérôme Pouiller
@ 2013-05-14 15:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-14 15:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-14 21:52 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2013-05-14 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear J?r?me Pouiller,
On Tue, 14 May 2013 16:30:50 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> -$(BUILD_DIR)/.root:
> +$(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed:
> mkdir -p $(TARGET_DIR)
> rsync -a \
> --exclude .empty --exclude .svn --exclude .git \
> --exclude .hg --exclude=CVS --exclude '*~' \
> $(TARGET_SKELETON)/ $(TARGET_DIR)/
> cp support/misc/target-dir-warning.txt $(TARGET_DIR_WARNING_FILE)
> + mkdir -p $(STAMP_DIR)
> touch $@
I'm generally ok with the idea, but I don't like this mkdir. There is
already a mkdir that creates the stamp file directory, in the main
Makefile.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-05-14 15:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2013-05-14 15:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-14 22:23 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-05-14 21:52 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Pouiller @ 2013-05-14 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Tuesday 14 May 2013 17:07:21 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear J?r?me Pouiller,
>
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 16:30:50 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> > -$(BUILD_DIR)/.root:
> >
> > +$(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed:
> > mkdir -p $(TARGET_DIR)
> > rsync -a \
> >
> > --exclude .empty --exclude .svn --exclude .git \
> > --exclude .hg --exclude=CVS --exclude '*~' \
> > $(TARGET_SKELETON)/ $(TARGET_DIR)/
> >
> > cp support/misc/target-dir-warning.txt $(TARGET_DIR_WARNING_FILE)
> >
> > + mkdir -p $(STAMP_DIR)
> >
> > touch $@
>
> I'm generally ok with the idea, but I don't like this mkdir. There is
> already a mkdir that creates the stamp file directory, in the main
> Makefile.
I also dislike this mkdir. My problem is to be sure $(STAMP_DIR) is created
before $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed.
I can change order of dependencies in dirs target but this solution is too
fragile.
I cannot just add a dependency between $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed
and $(STAMP_DIR).
I can add a stampfile for $(STAMP_DIR) but it looks a little complicated.
I can also use an intermediate phony target (like dirs target) but it also
looks complicated.
Any better idea?
--
J?r?me Pouiller, Sysmic
Embedded Linux specialist
http://www.sysmic.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-05-14 15:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-14 15:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
@ 2013-05-14 21:52 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 22:06 ` Yann E. MORIN
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2013-05-14 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On 14/05/13 17:07, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear J?r?me Pouiller,
>
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 16:30:50 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
>
>> -$(BUILD_DIR)/.root:
>> +$(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed:
>> mkdir -p $(TARGET_DIR)
>> rsync -a \
>> --exclude .empty --exclude .svn --exclude .git \
>> --exclude .hg --exclude=CVS --exclude '*~' \
>> $(TARGET_SKELETON)/ $(TARGET_DIR)/
>> cp support/misc/target-dir-warning.txt $(TARGET_DIR_WARNING_FILE)
>> + mkdir -p $(STAMP_DIR)
>> touch $@
>
> I'm generally ok with the idea, but I don't like this mkdir. There is
> already a mkdir that creates the stamp file directory, in the main
> Makefile.
I don't have an issue with a few redundant mkdir -p calls.
I would like to see a $(Q) in front of it though - but then it should
be in front of the rest as well, and with a $(MESSAGE) call.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-05-14 21:52 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
@ 2013-05-14 22:06 ` Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2013-05-14 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Arnout, All,
On 2013-05-14 23:52 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle spake thusly:
> On 14/05/13 17:07, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> >Dear J?r?me Pouiller,
> >
> >On Tue, 14 May 2013 16:30:50 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> >
> >>-$(BUILD_DIR)/.root:
> >>+$(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed:
> >> mkdir -p $(TARGET_DIR)
> >> rsync -a \
> >> --exclude .empty --exclude .svn --exclude .git \
> >> --exclude .hg --exclude=CVS --exclude '*~' \
> >> $(TARGET_SKELETON)/ $(TARGET_DIR)/
> >> cp support/misc/target-dir-warning.txt $(TARGET_DIR_WARNING_FILE)
> >>+ mkdir -p $(STAMP_DIR)
> >> touch $@
> >
> >I'm generally ok with the idea, but I don't like this mkdir. There is
> >already a mkdir that creates the stamp file directory, in the main
> >Makefile.
>
> I don't have an issue with a few redundant mkdir -p calls.
I concur with Thomas: we should ensure the stamp-dir is already created
in a generic way, it's kind of an internal stuff, which should not be
visible to users (I mean: packages, and stuff like that, not actual
persons).
That we need to sprinkle the code with a few 'mkdir' here and ther "just
in case" is an indication we do not fully masterise the chain of events,
and is really not nice.
The fact that the 'mkdir' is needed in the first place is because of this
rulle in the top-level Makefile:
dirs: [...] $(TARGET_DIR) [...] $(STAMP_DIR)
which will have 'make' run the $(TARGET_DIR) goal before the
$(STAMP_DIR) goal.
This can be solved in two ways: the nice one, and the not-so-nice one:
- have an additional rule:
$(TARGET_DIR): $(STAMP_DIR) <- the nice way
- invert the order of goals in the 'dirs' rule <- the not-so-nice way
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-05-14 15:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
@ 2013-05-14 22:23 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-05-15 6:19 ` Jérôme Pouiller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2013-05-14 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
J?r?me, All,
On 2013-05-14 17:27 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller spake thusly:
> On Tuesday 14 May 2013 17:07:21 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Dear J?r?me Pouiller,
> >
> > On Tue, 14 May 2013 16:30:50 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> > > -$(BUILD_DIR)/.root:
> > >
> > > +$(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed:
> > > mkdir -p $(TARGET_DIR)
> > > rsync -a \
> > >
> > > --exclude .empty --exclude .svn --exclude .git \
> > > --exclude .hg --exclude=CVS --exclude '*~' \
> > > $(TARGET_SKELETON)/ $(TARGET_DIR)/
> > >
> > > cp support/misc/target-dir-warning.txt $(TARGET_DIR_WARNING_FILE)
> > >
> > > + mkdir -p $(STAMP_DIR)
> > >
> > > touch $@
> >
> > I'm generally ok with the idea, but I don't like this mkdir. There is
> > already a mkdir that creates the stamp file directory, in the main
> > Makefile.
> I also dislike this mkdir. My problem is to be sure $(STAMP_DIR) is created
> before $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed.
>
> I can change order of dependencies in dirs target but this solution is too
> fragile.
Agreed, this is not-so-nice.
> I cannot just add a dependency between $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed
> and $(STAMP_DIR).
Why not? Like:
$(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed: $(STAMP_DIR)
which to me looks like the sane solution (and not what I previosuly
answered Arnout about $(TARGET_DIR))
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-05-14 22:23 ` Yann E. MORIN
@ 2013-05-15 6:19 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-15 6:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-15 20:59 ` Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Pouiller @ 2013-05-15 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 00:23:24 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
[...]
> > I cannot just add a dependency between
> > $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed and $(STAMP_DIR).
>
> Why not? Like:
> $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed: $(STAMP_DIR)
>
> which to me looks like the sane solution (and not what I previosuly
> answered Arnout about $(TARGET_DIR))
Because, $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed will be rebuilt each time a
file is added or removed from $(STAMP_DIR).
--
J?r?me Pouiller, Sysmic
Embedded Linux specialist
http://www.sysmic.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-05-15 6:19 ` Jérôme Pouiller
@ 2013-05-15 6:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-15 21:01 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-05-15 20:59 ` Yann E. MORIN
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Pouiller @ 2013-05-15 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 08:19:10 J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 May 2013 00:23:24 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > I cannot just add a dependency between
> > > $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed and $(STAMP_DIR).
> >
> > Why not? Like:
> > $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed: $(STAMP_DIR)
> >
> > which to me looks like the sane solution (and not what I previosuly
> > answered Arnout about $(TARGET_DIR))
>
> Because, $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed will be rebuilt each time a
> file is added or removed from $(STAMP_DIR).
But, we may use an intermediate phony target:
$(STAMP_DIR)_phony: $(STAMP_DIR)
.PHONY: $(STAMP_DIR)_phony
$(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed: $(STAMP_DIR)_phony
(not tested, but should work)
--
J?r?me Pouiller, Sysmic
Embedded Linux specialist
http://www.sysmic.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-05-15 6:19 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-15 6:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
@ 2013-05-15 20:59 ` Yann E. MORIN
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2013-05-15 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On 2013-05-15 08:19 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller spake thusly:
> On Wednesday 15 May 2013 00:23:24 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> [...]
> > > I cannot just add a dependency between
> > > $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed and $(STAMP_DIR).
> >
> > Why not? Like:
> > $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed: $(STAMP_DIR)
> >
> > which to me looks like the sane solution (and not what I previosuly
> > answered Arnout about $(TARGET_DIR))
> Because, $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed will be rebuilt each time a
> file is added or removed from $(STAMP_DIR).
Indeed. Sigh. Too short-sighted I was...
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name
2013-05-15 6:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
@ 2013-05-15 21:01 ` Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2013-05-15 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
J?r?me, All,
On 2013-05-15 08:27 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller spake thusly:
> On Wednesday 15 May 2013 08:19:10 J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 May 2013 00:23:24 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > > I cannot just add a dependency between
> > > > $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed and $(STAMP_DIR).
> > >
> > > Why not? Like:
> > > $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed: $(STAMP_DIR)
> > >
> > > which to me looks like the sane solution (and not what I previosuly
> > > answered Arnout about $(TARGET_DIR))
> >
> > Because, $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed will be rebuilt each time a
> > file is added or removed from $(STAMP_DIR).
> But, we may use an intermediate phony target:
> $(STAMP_DIR)_phony: $(STAMP_DIR)
> .PHONY: $(STAMP_DIR)_phony
> $(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed: $(STAMP_DIR)_phony
Or an order-only rule:
$(STAMP_DIR)/skeleton-target-installed: | $(STAMP_DIR)
(not tested, but it's used in the crosstool-NG backend)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-15 21:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-17 11:04 [Buildroot] Target rebuilding Jérôme Pouiller
2013-01-17 13:27 ` Stephan Hoffmann
2013-01-18 9:43 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-01-19 16:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 14:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] Standardisation of $(BUILD)/.root name Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-14 15:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-14 15:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-14 22:23 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-05-15 6:19 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-15 6:27 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-05-15 21:01 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-05-15 20:59 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-05-14 21:52 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 22:06 ` Yann E. MORIN
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox