From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] bandwidthd: fix static build
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 14:40:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141005144043.7b3aaac0@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141005045037.GA2567@sapphire.tkos.co.il>
Baruch, Nathaniel,
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 07:50:37 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Hi Baruch, I didn't end up using pcap-config, but could you check git
> > version 4b07a0b3d3a280cdde582060cb29f3333ba4bf6e for me? It seems to
> > work in the config you pasted above and I haven't had any issues in my
> > other tests.
>
> I can confirm that upgrading bandwidthd to
> 4b07a0b3d3a280cdde582060cb29f3333ba4bf6e fixes the build of the config above.
> I still think that holding the complete knowledge of all your indirect
> dependencies, mandatory and optional, is not robust. A better future proof
> solution IMO is to use tools like pkg-config (or pcap-config in the case of
> libpcap) to list all dependencies that are in actual use for this specific
> build. But this is your call as upstream.
I definitely agree with Baruch here. Using pkg-config is much more
robust, as it figures out the indirect dependencies automatically,
without hardcoding them in bandwidthd and/or Buildroot.
However, Baruch patch doesn't seem to be fully correct: it does both a
PKG_CHECK_MODULES on libpng, and an AC_CHECK_LIB, which seems a bit
redundant.
Therefore, Nathaniel, since you're now the upstream developer, could
you make the necessary changes in configure.ac to use pkg-config
instead, and then send a patch updating Buildroot to a new version of
bandwidthd ?
In the mean time, I'll mark:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/395809/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/381899/
as 'Changes requested'.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-05 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-02 6:49 [Buildroot] [PATCH] bandwidthd: fix static build Baruch Siach
[not found] ` <542CFECE.9020103@gmail.com>
2014-10-02 7:52 ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-02 7:56 ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-02 7:58 ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-02 8:24 ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-02 8:33 ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-03 6:35 ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-05 4:50 ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-05 12:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-10-05 13:01 ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-05 13:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141005144043.7b3aaac0@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox