From: Nathaniel Roach <nroach44@gmail.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] bandwidthd: fix static build
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:56:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542D0518.3050704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141002075203.GG3006@sapphire.tkos.co.il>
On 02/10/14 15:52, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Nathaniel,
>
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:29:18PM +0800, Nathaniel Roach wrote:
>> On 02/10/14 14:49, Baruch Siach wrote:
>>> Build against libpng requires -lz when built statically. Patch configure.ac to
>>> get the needed information from pkg-config.
>>>
>>> This patch can not be directly upstreamed as it conflicts with upstream
>>> changes, but a proper fix would be based on the same idea.
>>>
>>> Fixes:
>>> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e49/e496cc4315c06de61379222d3e842d4cd05b2f71/
>>>
>>> Cc: Nathaniel Roach <nroach44@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
>>> ---
>> Hi Baruch, I've already put a patch through [1] that bumps the version
>> in BR, which AFAIK fixes the issues that we've had on the autobuilders.
>
> Well, I should have been aware to this patch since it seems I also commented
> on it, but I forgot. I still think this is the right solution, since it would
> also work if libpng changes its dependencies. Assuming, of course, that
> bandwidthd doesn't use libz directly.
>
> Note that I also tried to upgrade to -r10, but build fails with this specific
> non-thread defconfig because bandwidthd now requires a toolchain supporting
> -lpthread. So technically this specific configuration is still broken after
> applying http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/381899/.
>
> baruch
>
>> I'm not sure what to do in this situation but I thought I'd just note
>> this here in case my patch had been forgotten.
>>
>> [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/381899/
>
I do vaguely remember some issue with -lpthread, could you send me the
config?
(It was a while ago, but I'm sure I tested the patch with a basic ARM
config, and IIRC I had the -lpthread issue once or twice but was never
able to reproduce it after my patch)
Thanks, Nathaniel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-02 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-02 6:49 [Buildroot] [PATCH] bandwidthd: fix static build Baruch Siach
[not found] ` <542CFECE.9020103@gmail.com>
2014-10-02 7:52 ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-02 7:56 ` Nathaniel Roach [this message]
2014-10-02 7:58 ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-02 8:24 ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-02 8:33 ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-03 6:35 ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-05 4:50 ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-05 12:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-10-05 13:01 ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-05 13:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542D0518.3050704@gmail.com \
--to=nroach44@gmail.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox