Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathaniel Roach <nroach44@gmail.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] bandwidthd: fix static build
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:24:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <542D0BC9.4060905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141002075844.GH3006@sapphire.tkos.co.il>

On 02/10/14 15:58, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Nathaniel,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:56:08PM +0800, Nathaniel Roach wrote:
>> On 02/10/14 15:52, Baruch Siach wrote:
>>> Hi Nathaniel,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:29:18PM +0800, Nathaniel Roach wrote:
>>>> On 02/10/14 14:49, Baruch Siach wrote:
>>>>> Build against libpng requires -lz when built statically. Patch configure.ac to
>>>>> get the needed information from pkg-config.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch can not be directly upstreamed as it conflicts with upstream
>>>>> changes, but a proper fix would be based on the same idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes:
>>>>> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e49/e496cc4315c06de61379222d3e842d4cd05b2f71/
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Nathaniel Roach <nroach44@gmail.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
>>>>> ---
>>>> Hi Baruch, I've already put a patch through [1] that bumps the version
>>>> in BR, which AFAIK fixes the issues that we've had on the autobuilders.
>>>
>>> Well, I should have been aware to this patch since it seems I also commented 
>>> on it, but I forgot. I still think this is the right solution, since it would 
>>> also work if libpng changes its dependencies. Assuming, of course, that 
>>> bandwidthd doesn't use libz directly.
>>>
>>> Note that I also tried to upgrade to -r10, but build fails with this specific 
>>> non-thread defconfig because bandwidthd now requires a toolchain supporting 
>>> -lpthread. So technically this specific configuration is still broken after 
>>> applying http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/381899/.
>>>
>>> baruch
>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what to do in this situation but I thought I'd just note
>>>> this here in case my patch had been forgotten.
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/381899/
>>
>> I do vaguely remember some issue with -lpthread, could you send me the
>> config?
>>
>> (It was a while ago, but I'm sure I tested the patch with a basic ARM
>> config, and IIRC I had the -lpthread issue once or twice but was never
>> able to reproduce it after my patch)
> 
> Get the config from 
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e49/e496cc4315c06de61379222d3e842d4cd05b2f71/config.
> 
> baruch
> 

After testing that, you are indeed correct.

I've gone through the emails from a while ago and it's something like this:

Bandwidthd needs libpcap.
If libpcap was compiled with libusb that needs to be checked for/handled.
And if libusb was used apparently /that/ is what needs pthreads, thus
adding an additional dependency on the configure.ac.

I'm not sure why I added a hard pass/fail check for lpthread, as I would
have thought I've done it like I handled like the lpng/zlib issue...

I'll have a play around and see what I can do.

Nathaniel Roach.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-02  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-02  6:49 [Buildroot] [PATCH] bandwidthd: fix static build Baruch Siach
     [not found] ` <542CFECE.9020103@gmail.com>
2014-10-02  7:52   ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-02  7:56     ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-02  7:58       ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-02  8:24         ` Nathaniel Roach [this message]
2014-10-02  8:33           ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-03  6:35             ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-05  4:50               ` Baruch Siach
2014-10-05 12:40                 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-10-05 13:01                   ` Nathaniel Roach
2014-10-05 13:12                     ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=542D0BC9.4060905@gmail.com \
    --to=nroach44@gmail.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox