[Buildroot] [URGENT 0/1] This patch is needed for host-util-linux

[Buildroot] [URGENT 0/1] This patch is needed for host-util-linux

[Giulio Benetti]

host-util-linux is very used, so please apply this asap, otherwise a lot
of builds will fail.

Giulio Benetti (1):
  package/util-linux: fix host build failure

 package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

[Buildroot] [URGENT 1/1] package/util-linux: fix host build failure

[Giulio Benetti]

The UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE workaround is needed for host
building too. So let's add it to HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS.
host-util-linux is used a lot, so this patch fixes a lot of future
builds.

Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
---
 package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
index e59ef7dadc..5a4ff64d01 100644
--- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
+++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
 	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
 endef
 UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
+HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
 
 HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
 
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [URGENT 1/1] package/util-linux: fix host build failure

[Giulio Benetti]

On 02/02/22 00:22, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> The UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE workaround is needed for host
> building too. So let's add it to HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS.
> host-util-linux is used a lot, so this patch fixes a lot of future
> builds.

I was too fast...

Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b8c/b8cb40efc036a01802c914544cd4fc29dfd67af6//

and others that are coming out.

Best regards!
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas

> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
> ---
>   package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> index e59ef7dadc..5a4ff64d01 100644
> --- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> +++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>   	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
>   endef
>   UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
> +HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>   
>   HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
>   

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [URGENT 1/1] package/util-linux: fix host build failure

[Arnout Vandecappelle]

On 02/02/2022 00:22, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> The UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE workaround is needed for host
> building too. So let's add it to HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS.
> host-util-linux is used a lot, so this patch fixes a lot of future
> builds.

  Darn, I tested that, both with and without BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX set. I 
don't understand what went wrong in my test...

  Anyway, applied to master, thanks.

  Regards,
  Arnout


> 
> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
> ---
>   package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> index e59ef7dadc..5a4ff64d01 100644
> --- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> +++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>   	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
>   endef
>   UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
> +HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>   
>   HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
>   
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [URGENT 1/1] package/util-linux: fix host build failure

[Peter Seiderer]

Hello Arnout, Giulio,

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:41:34 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:

> On 02/02/2022 00:22, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > The UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE workaround is needed for host
> > building too. So let's add it to HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS.
> > host-util-linux is used a lot, so this patch fixes a lot of future
> > builds.
>
>   Darn, I tested that, both with and without BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX set. I
> don't understand what went wrong in my test...

The raw support depends on the available toolchain headers, see e.g.
package/util-linux/Config.in:

	config BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_RAW
	        bool "raw"
	        depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_5_14
	        help
	          Build a linux raw character device

Or according to [1] '--disable-raw' for the host build should do
the trick too...

Regards,
Peter

[1] https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1577

>
>   Anyway, applied to master, thanks.
>
>   Regards,
>   Arnout
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
> > ---
> >   package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> > index e59ef7dadc..5a4ff64d01 100644
> > --- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> > +++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
> >   	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
> >   endef
> >   UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
> > +HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
> >
> >   HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
> >

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [URGENT 1/1] package/util-linux: fix host build failure

[Giulio Benetti]

Hi Peter,

On 02/02/22 21:42, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> Hello Arnout, Giulio,
> 
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:41:34 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
> 
>> On 02/02/2022 00:22, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>>> The UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE workaround is needed for host
>>> building too. So let's add it to HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS.
>>> host-util-linux is used a lot, so this patch fixes a lot of future
>>> builds.
>>
>>    Darn, I tested that, both with and without BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX set. I
>> don't understand what went wrong in my test...
> 
> The raw support depends on the available toolchain headers, see e.g.
> package/util-linux/Config.in:
> 
> 	config BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_RAW
> 	        bool "raw"
> 	        depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_5_14
> 	        help
> 	          Build a linux raw character device
> 
> Or according to [1] '--disable-raw' for the host build should do
> the trick too...

I was in hurry to produce the patch last night, so I went for the 
fastest way. Can you give a try with --disable-raw and eventually submit 
the patch? That would save some time while building. Also because 
host-util-linux is used a lot

Thank you!
Best regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas

> Regards,
> Peter
> 
> [1] https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1577
> 
>>
>>    Anyway, applied to master, thanks.
>>
>>    Regards,
>>    Arnout
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
>>> ---
>>>    package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 1 +
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
>>> index e59ef7dadc..5a4ff64d01 100644
>>> --- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
>>> +++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
>>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>>>    	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
>>>    endef
>>>    UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>>> +HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>>>
>>>    HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
>>>
> 

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [URGENT 1/1] package/util-linux: fix host build failure

[Peter Seiderer]

Hello Giulio,

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 22:09:22 +0100, Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> wrote:

> Hi Peter,
>
> On 02/02/22 21:42, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> > Hello Arnout, Giulio,
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:41:34 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/02/2022 00:22, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> >>> The UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE workaround is needed for host
> >>> building too. So let's add it to HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS.
> >>> host-util-linux is used a lot, so this patch fixes a lot of future
> >>> builds.
> >>
> >>    Darn, I tested that, both with and without BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX set. I
> >> don't understand what went wrong in my test...
> >
> > The raw support depends on the available toolchain headers, see e.g.
> > package/util-linux/Config.in:
> >
> > 	config BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_RAW
> > 	        bool "raw"
> > 	        depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_5_14
> > 	        help
> > 	          Build a linux raw character device
> >
> > Or according to [1] '--disable-raw' for the host build should do
> > the trick too...
>
> I was in hurry to produce the patch last night, so I went for the
> fastest way. Can you give a try with --disable-raw and eventually submit

Thanks for taking care!

> the patch? That would save some time while building. Also because
> host-util-linux is used a lot

Sorry, could not reproduce the host-build failure on my system, seems the
toolchain is too up-to-date (openSUSE Tumbleweed - gcc-11.2.1) ;-)

But can provide an RFC patch for testing...

Regards,
Peter

>
> Thank you!
> Best regards

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [URGENT 1/1] package/util-linux: fix host build failure

[Giulio Benetti]

On 02/02/22 22:40, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> Hello Giulio,
> 
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 22:09:22 +0100, Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 02/02/22 21:42, Peter Seiderer wrote:
>>> Hello Arnout, Giulio,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:41:34 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/02/2022 00:22, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>>>>> The UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE workaround is needed for host
>>>>> building too. So let's add it to HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS.
>>>>> host-util-linux is used a lot, so this patch fixes a lot of future
>>>>> builds.
>>>>
>>>>     Darn, I tested that, both with and without BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX set. I
>>>> don't understand what went wrong in my test...
>>>
>>> The raw support depends on the available toolchain headers, see e.g.
>>> package/util-linux/Config.in:
>>>
>>> 	config BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_RAW
>>> 	        bool "raw"
>>> 	        depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_5_14
>>> 	        help
>>> 	          Build a linux raw character device
>>>
>>> Or according to [1] '--disable-raw' for the host build should do
>>> the trick too...
>>
>> I was in hurry to produce the patch last night, so I went for the
>> fastest way. Can you give a try with --disable-raw and eventually submit
> 
> Thanks for taking care!
> 
>> the patch? That would save some time while building. Also because
>> host-util-linux is used a lot
> 
> Sorry, could not reproduce the host-build failure on my system, seems the
> toolchain is too up-to-date (openSUSE Tumbleweed - gcc-11.2.1) ;-)
> 
> But can provide an RFC patch for testing...

I give a go on my pc and if it works I add
Suggested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>

Are you on IRC? If yes my nick is benettig you can ping me there :-)

Best regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

[Buildroot] [PATCH] package/util-linux: improve host build failure fix

[Giulio Benetti]

As suggested by Peter Seiderer package util-linux doesn't need raw support
when built for host, so let's remove:
HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
in favor of:
HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += --disable-raw
This is a better approach than my commit:
https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=d895bd973b35fde10d3dd7db530d9e4782926497

Suggested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
---
 package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
index 5a4ff64d01..f3297257cf 100644
--- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
+++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
 	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
 endef
 UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
-HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
 
 HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
 
@@ -49,7 +48,8 @@ HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
 HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS = \
 	--without-systemd \
 	--with-systemdsystemunitdir=no \
-	--without-python
+	--without-python \
+	--disable-raw
 
 ifneq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES)$(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_CRAMFS)$(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_FSCK)$(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LOSETUP),)
 UTIL_LINUX_SELINUX_MODULES = fstools
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [URGENT 1/1] package/util-linux: fix host build failure

[Giulio Benetti]

Hi Peter,

On 02/02/22 22:40, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> Hello Giulio,
> 
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 22:09:22 +0100, Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 02/02/22 21:42, Peter Seiderer wrote:
>>> Hello Arnout, Giulio,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:41:34 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/02/2022 00:22, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>>>>> The UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE workaround is needed for host
>>>>> building too. So let's add it to HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS.
>>>>> host-util-linux is used a lot, so this patch fixes a lot of future
>>>>> builds.
>>>>
>>>>     Darn, I tested that, both with and without BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX set. I
>>>> don't understand what went wrong in my test...
>>>
>>> The raw support depends on the available toolchain headers, see e.g.
>>> package/util-linux/Config.in:
>>>
>>> 	config BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_RAW
>>> 	        bool "raw"
>>> 	        depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_5_14
>>> 	        help
>>> 	          Build a linux raw character device
>>>
>>> Or according to [1] '--disable-raw' for the host build should do
>>> the trick too...
>>
>> I was in hurry to produce the patch last night, so I went for the
>> fastest way. Can you give a try with --disable-raw and eventually submit
> 
> Thanks for taking care!

I've just sent a patch like you've suggested:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20220202220538.2858380-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com/

>> the patch? That would save some time while building. Also because
>> host-util-linux is used a lot
> 
> Sorry, could not reproduce the host-build failure on my system, seems the
> toolchain is too up-to-date (openSUSE Tumbleweed - gcc-11.2.1) ;-)

For this situation you can use this docker:
docker pull registry.gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/base:20220105.2314

There gcc is version 10.2.1 and it's the official one used for 
build-testing buildroot defconfigs. You can find it also in 
buildroot/.gitlab-ci.yml

Can you give a go with that docker by reproducing the failure and then 
applying the latest patch?

That way you can give a Reviewed-by: or also a Tested-by: you

Thank you!
Kind regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/util-linux: improve host build failure fix

[Peter Seiderer]

Hello Giulio,

On Wed,  2 Feb 2022 23:05:38 +0100, Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> wrote:

> As suggested by Peter Seiderer package util-linux doesn't need raw support
> when built for host, so let's remove:
> HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
> in favor of:
> HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += --disable-raw
> This is a better approach than my commit:
> https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=d895bd973b35fde10d3dd7db530d9e4782926497
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>

Tested with registry.gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/base:20220105.2314:

- reverted 'package/util-linux: fix host build failure' (d895bd973b35fde10d3dd7db530d9e4782926497)
  --> build fails with: No rule to make target 'disk-utils/raw.8'

- build with 'package/util-linux: fix host build failure' (d895bd973b35fde10d3dd7db530d9e4782926497)
  --> build o.k.

- build with this additional patch
  --> build o.k.

Tested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>


> ---
>  package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> index 5a4ff64d01..f3297257cf 100644
> --- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> +++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>  	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
>  endef
>  UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
> -HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>
>  HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
>

The line above reads:

	# We also don't want the host-python dependency

> @@ -49,7 +48,8 @@ HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
>  HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS = \
>  	--without-systemd \
>  	--with-systemdsystemunitdir=no \
> -	--without-python
> +	--without-python \
> +	--disable-raw

So I would move the 'disable-raw' down to line 196ff (or below to an
extra 'HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS +=' section with comment why...

With this change you can add my:

Reviewed-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>

Regards,
Peter

>
>  ifneq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES)$(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_CRAMFS)$(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_FSCK)$(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LOSETUP),)
>  UTIL_LINUX_SELINUX_MODULES = fstools

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/util-linux: improve host build failure fix

[Giulio Benetti]

Hi Peter,

On 03/02/22 21:23, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> Hello Giulio,
> 
> On Wed,  2 Feb 2022 23:05:38 +0100, Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> wrote:
> 
>> As suggested by Peter Seiderer package util-linux doesn't need raw support
>> when built for host, so let's remove:
>> HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>> in favor of:
>> HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += --disable-raw
>> This is a better approach than my commit:
>> https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=d895bd973b35fde10d3dd7db530d9e4782926497
>>
>> Suggested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
> 
> Tested with registry.gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/base:20220105.2314:
> 
> - reverted 'package/util-linux: fix host build failure' (d895bd973b35fde10d3dd7db530d9e4782926497)
>    --> build fails with: No rule to make target 'disk-utils/raw.8'
> 
> - build with 'package/util-linux: fix host build failure' (d895bd973b35fde10d3dd7db530d9e4782926497)
>    --> build o.k.
> 
> - build with this additional patch
>    --> build o.k.
> 
> Tested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
> 
> 
>> ---
>>   package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
>> index 5a4ff64d01..f3297257cf 100644
>> --- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
>> +++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
>> @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>>   	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
>>   endef
>>   UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>> -HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>>
>>   HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
>>
> 
> The line above reads:
> 
> 	# We also don't want the host-python dependency

Oh, you're totally right

>> @@ -49,7 +48,8 @@ HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
>>   HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS = \
>>   	--without-systemd \
>>   	--with-systemdsystemunitdir=no \
>> -	--without-python
>> +	--without-python \
>> +	--disable-raw
> 
> So I would move the 'disable-raw' down to line 196ff (or below to an
> extra 'HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS +=' section with comment why...

Yes

> With this change you can add my:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
> 
> Regards,
> Peter
> 
>>
>>   ifneq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES)$(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_CRAMFS)$(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_FSCK)$(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LOSETUP),)
>>   UTIL_LINUX_SELINUX_MODULES = fstools
> 

Thank you!

Going to reply with V2.

Best regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2] package/util-linux: improve host build failure fix

[Giulio Benetti]

As suggested by Peter Seiderer package util-linux doesn't need raw support
when built for host, so let's remove:
HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
in favor of:
HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += --disable-raw
This is a better approach than my commit:
https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=d895bd973b35fde10d3dd7db530d9e4782926497

Suggested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
Tested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
---
V1->V2:
* move --disable-raw to a dedicated HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS as suggested
by Peter Seiderer. This avoid ambiguity since previously it was under the
comment "# We also don't want the host-python dependency".
---
 package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
index 5a4ff64d01..40fd518a58 100644
--- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
+++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
 	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
 endef
 UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
-HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
 
 HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
 
@@ -202,6 +201,11 @@ HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += \
 	--without-ncursesw \
 	--without-tinfo
 
+# Disable raw command since starting from version 2.37 needs a
+# work-around to build but in the end we don't need at all.
+HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += \
+	--disable-raw
+
 ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX),y)
 HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += --disable-makeinstall-chown
 # disable commands that have ncurses dependency, as well as
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] package/util-linux: improve host build failure fix

[Arnout Vandecappelle]

On 03/02/2022 23:31, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> As suggested by Peter Seiderer package util-linux doesn't need raw support
> when built for host, so let's remove:
> HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
> in favor of:
> HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += --disable-raw
> This is a better approach than my commit:
> https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=d895bd973b35fde10d3dd7db530d9e4782926497
> 
> Suggested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
> Tested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>

  Applied to master, thanks.

  Regards,
  Arnout

> ---
> V1->V2:
> * move --disable-raw to a dedicated HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS as suggested
> by Peter Seiderer. This avoid ambiguity since previously it was under the
> comment "# We also don't want the host-python dependency".
> ---
>   package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 6 +++++-
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> index 5a4ff64d01..40fd518a58 100644
> --- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> +++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ define UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>   	touch $(@D)/disk-utils/raw.8
>   endef
>   UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
> -HOST_UTIL_LINUX_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += UTIL_LINUX_FIX_DISK_UTILS_COMPILE
>   
>   HOST_UTIL_LINUX_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
>   
> @@ -202,6 +201,11 @@ HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += \
>   	--without-ncursesw \
>   	--without-tinfo
>   
> +# Disable raw command since starting from version 2.37 needs a
> +# work-around to build but in the end we don't need at all.
> +HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += \
> +	--disable-raw
> +
>   ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX),y)
>   HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += --disable-makeinstall-chown
>   # disable commands that have ncurses dependency, as well as
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot