Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] ladspa-sdk: new package
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:50:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E14394.2030309@barkynet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140804222345.65aacf17@free-electrons.com>


Thomas,

On 04/08/14 21:23, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Martin Bark,
>
> Sorry for the lack of feedback until now on these patches. See below
> for a number of comments.

That's fine, to be honest I forgot I submitted these patches :)

>
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:19:42 +0100, Martin Bark wrote:
>> LADSPA is a standard that allows software audio processors and
>> effects to be plugged into a wide range of audio synthesis and
>> recording packages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com>
>
> First, looking at LADSPA, it seems like there has been no releases
> since 2007 or so. Is this still actively developed and used? Googling
> around, I've seen mentions of a new thing called LV2 which would be a
> LADSPA replacement.

Originally I started this because I wanted an equaliser for some work i 
was doing with acoustic echo cancellation. alsaeqaul was a quick easy 
way to add a equaliser i could change real time.  alsaequal needs caps 
which is an ladsp module hence the 3 patches.

I don't know if ladsp is under active development.  Really it's just the 
definition of an API in a C header file so I think it's not meant to 
change.  It's the packages like caps which implement the interface which 
i expect to be active.

caps is self contained (it includes a copy of ladsp.h) and does not need 
this ladsp-sdk package, i added it for completeness.

Is the lack of development activity an issue?  I could drop ladsp-sdk if 
you like.  Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks

Martin

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-05 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-24 21:19 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] ladspa-sdk: new package Martin Bark
2014-04-24 21:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] caps: " Martin Bark
2014-08-04 20:28   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-05 20:51     ` Martin Bark
2014-04-24 21:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] alsaequal: " Martin Bark
2014-08-04 20:32   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-05 20:52     ` Martin Bark
2014-08-06  8:00       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-04 20:23 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] ladspa-sdk: " Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-05 20:50   ` Martin Bark [this message]
2014-08-06  7:59     ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E14394.2030309@barkynet.com \
    --to=martin@barkynet.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox