From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC -v2 09/11] cpuset: refactor partition_cpus_change
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:34:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3815a523-a6d1-4612-8ec8-b955694a5792@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909033233.2731579-10-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
On 9/8/25 11:32 PM, Chen Ridong wrote:
> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>
> Refactor the partition_cpus_change function to handle both regular CPU
> set updates and exclusive CPU modifications, either of which may trigger
> partition state changes. This generalized function will also be utilized
> for exclusive CPU updates in subsequent patches.
>
> With the introduction of compute_trialcs_excpus in a previous patch,
> the trialcs->effective_xcpus field is now consistently computed and
> maintained. Consequently, the legacy logic which assigned
> **trialcs->allowed_cpus to a local 'xcpus' variable** when
> trialcs->effective_xcpus was empty has been removed.
>
> This removal is safe because when trialcs is not a partition member,
> trialcs->effective_xcpus is now correctly populated with the intersection
> of user_xcpus and the parent's effective_xcpus. This calculation inherently
> covers the scenario previously handled by the removed code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 6aa93bd9d5dd..de61520f1e44 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -2453,6 +2453,45 @@ static int cpus_allowed_validate_change(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialc
> return retval;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * partition_cpus_change - Handle partition state changes due to CPU mask updates
> + * @cs: The target cpuset being modified
> + * @trialcs: The trial cpuset containing proposed configuration changes
> + * @tmp: Temporary masks for intermediate calculations
> + *
> + * This function handles partition state transitions triggered by CPU mask changes.
> + * CPU modifications may cause a partition to be disabled or require state updates.
> + */
> +static void partition_cpus_change(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
> + struct tmpmasks *tmp)
> +{
> + enum prs_errcode prs_err;
> +
> + if (cs_is_member(cs))
> + return;
> +
> + prs_err = validate_partition(cs, trialcs);
> + if (prs_err) {
> + trialcs->prs_err = prs_err;
> + cs->prs_err = prs_err;
> + }
The assignment can be simplified into
trialcs->prs_err = cs->prs_err = prs_err;
> +
> + if (is_remote_partition(cs)) {
> + if (trialcs->prs_err)
> + remote_partition_disable(cs, tmp);
> + else
> + remote_cpus_update(cs, trialcs->exclusive_cpus,
> + trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp);
> + } else {
> + if (trialcs->prs_err)
> + update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_invalidate,
> + NULL, tmp);
> + else
> + update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_update,
> + trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * update_cpumask - update the cpus_allowed mask of a cpuset and all tasks in it
> * @cs: the cpuset to consider
> @@ -2466,7 +2505,6 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
> struct tmpmasks tmp;
> bool force = false;
> int old_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
> - enum prs_errcode prs_err;
>
> retval = parse_cpuset_cpulist(buf, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
> if (retval < 0)
> @@ -2491,31 +2529,7 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
> */
> force = !cpumask_equal(cs->effective_xcpus, trialcs->effective_xcpus);
>
> - prs_err = validate_partition(cs, trialcs);
> - if (prs_err) {
> - trialcs->prs_err = prs_err;
> - cs->prs_err = prs_err;
> - }
> -
> - if (is_partition_valid(cs) ||
> - (is_partition_invalid(cs) && !trialcs->prs_err)) {
> - struct cpumask *xcpus = trialcs->effective_xcpus;
> -
> - if (cpumask_empty(xcpus) && is_partition_invalid(cs))
> - xcpus = trialcs->cpus_allowed;
> -
> - /*
> - * Call remote_cpus_update() to handle valid remote partition
> - */
> - if (is_remote_partition(cs))
> - remote_cpus_update(cs, NULL, xcpus, &tmp);
> - else if (trialcs->prs_err)
> - update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_invalidate,
> - NULL, &tmp);
> - else
> - update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_update,
> - xcpus, &tmp);
> - }
> + partition_cpus_change(cs, trialcs, &tmp);
>
> spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 3:32 [PATCH -next RFC -v2 00/11] Refactor cpus mask setting Chen Ridong
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 01/11] cpuset: move the root cpuset write check earlier Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:43 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 02/11] cpuset: remove unused assignment to trialcs->partition_root_state Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:44 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 03/11] cpuset: change return type of is_partition_[in]valid to bool Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:44 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 04/11] cpuset: Refactor exclusive CPU mask computation logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:47 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 05/11] cpuset: refactor CPU mask buffer parsing logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:49 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 06/11] cpuset: introduce cpus_excl_conflict and mems_excl_conflict helpers Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:42 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16 7:59 ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 07/11] cpuset: refactor out validate_partition Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:53 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 08/11] cpuset: refactor cpus_allowed_validate_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:05 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 09/11] cpuset: refactor partition_cpus_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:34 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-09-16 8:01 ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 10/11] cpuset: use parse_cpulist for setting cpus.exclusive Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:39 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 11/11] cpuset: use partition_cpus_change for setting exclusive cpus Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 20:05 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16 8:02 ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 11:18 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 00/11] Refactor cpus mask setting Chen Ridong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3815a523-a6d1-4612-8ec8-b955694a5792@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox