From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC -v2 11/11] cpuset: use partition_cpus_change for setting exclusive cpus
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:05:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7937af93-9652-4032-93c9-7d7d8571c52b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909033233.2731579-12-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
On 9/8/25 11:32 PM, Chen Ridong wrote:
> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>
> Previous patches have refactored partition_cpus_change. Now replace the
> exclusive cpus setting logic with this helper function.
Nit: The term "refactor" usually mean updating the code of an existing
function, sometimes extracting out code into new helper functions. In
your case, partition_cpus_change() is a new helper function. This is
also an issue in some of the earlier patches. I would prefer using
phrase like "A previous patch has introduced a new helper function
partition_cpus_change()"
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 29 ++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 785a2740b0ea..6a44dfabe9dd 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -2562,8 +2562,6 @@ static int update_exclusive_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
> {
> int retval;
> struct tmpmasks tmp;
> - struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cs);
> - bool invalidate = false;
> bool force = false;
> int old_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
>
> @@ -2595,32 +2593,9 @@ static int update_exclusive_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
> if (alloc_tmpmasks(&tmp))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (old_prs) {
> - if (cpumask_empty(trialcs->effective_xcpus)) {
> - invalidate = true;
> - cs->prs_err = PERR_INVCPUS;
> - } else if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(old_prs, trialcs->effective_xcpus)) {
> - invalidate = true;
> - cs->prs_err = PERR_HKEEPING;
> - } else if (tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, trialcs->effective_xcpus)) {
> - invalidate = true;
> - cs->prs_err = PERR_NOCPUS;
> - }
> + trialcs->prs_err = PERR_NONE;
> + partition_cpus_change(cs, trialcs, &tmp);
>
> - if (is_remote_partition(cs)) {
> - if (invalidate)
> - remote_partition_disable(cs, &tmp);
> - else
> - remote_cpus_update(cs, trialcs->exclusive_cpus,
> - trialcs->effective_xcpus, &tmp);
> - } else if (invalidate) {
> - update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_invalidate,
> - NULL, &tmp);
> - } else {
> - update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_update,
> - trialcs->effective_xcpus, &tmp);
> - }
> - }
> spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> cpumask_copy(cs->exclusive_cpus, trialcs->exclusive_cpus);
> cpumask_copy(cs->effective_xcpus, trialcs->effective_xcpus);
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 3:32 [PATCH -next RFC -v2 00/11] Refactor cpus mask setting Chen Ridong
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 01/11] cpuset: move the root cpuset write check earlier Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:43 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 02/11] cpuset: remove unused assignment to trialcs->partition_root_state Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:44 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 03/11] cpuset: change return type of is_partition_[in]valid to bool Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:44 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 04/11] cpuset: Refactor exclusive CPU mask computation logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:47 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 05/11] cpuset: refactor CPU mask buffer parsing logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:49 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 06/11] cpuset: introduce cpus_excl_conflict and mems_excl_conflict helpers Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:42 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16 7:59 ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 07/11] cpuset: refactor out validate_partition Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:53 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 08/11] cpuset: refactor cpus_allowed_validate_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:05 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 09/11] cpuset: refactor partition_cpus_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:34 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16 8:01 ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 10/11] cpuset: use parse_cpulist for setting cpus.exclusive Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:39 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 11/11] cpuset: use partition_cpus_change for setting exclusive cpus Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 20:05 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-09-16 8:02 ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 11:18 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 00/11] Refactor cpus mask setting Chen Ridong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7937af93-9652-4032-93c9-7d7d8571c52b@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox