From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC -v2 05/11] cpuset: refactor CPU mask buffer parsing logic
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 14:49:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfc4da47-2694-4470-ba14-ee62b91e52e0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909033233.2731579-6-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
On 9/8/25 11:32 PM, Chen Ridong wrote:
> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>
> The current implementation contains redundant handling for empty mask
> inputs, as cpulist_parse() already properly handles these cases. This
> refactoring introduces a new helper function parse_cpuset_cpulist() to
> consolidate CPU list parsing logic and eliminate special-case checks for
> empty inputs.
>
> Additionally, the effective_xcpus computation for trial cpusets has been
> simplified. Rather than computing effective_xcpus only when exclusive_cpus
> is set or when the cpuset forms a valid partition, we now recalculate it
> on every cpuset.cpus update. This approach ensures consistency and allows
> removal of redundant effective_xcpus logic in subsequent patches.
>
> The trial cpuset's effective_xcpus calculation follows two distinct cases:
> 1. For member cpusets: effective_xcpus is determined by the intersection
> of cpuset->exclusive_cpus and the parent's effective_xcpus.
> 2. For non-member cpusets: effective_xcpus is derived from the intersection
> of user_xcpus and the parent's effective_xcpus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 6015322a10ac..55674a5ad2f9 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,11 @@ static inline bool is_partition_invalid(const struct cpuset *cs)
> return cs->partition_root_state < 0;
> }
>
> +static inline bool cs_is_member(const struct cpuset *cs)
> +{
> + return cs->partition_root_state == PRS_MEMBER;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Callers should hold callback_lock to modify partition_root_state.
> */
> @@ -1478,7 +1483,13 @@ static int compute_trialcs_excpus(struct cpuset *trialcs, struct cpuset *cs)
> struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(trialcs);
> struct cpumask *excpus = trialcs->effective_xcpus;
>
> - cpumask_and(excpus, user_xcpus(trialcs), parent->effective_xcpus);
> + /* trialcs is member, cpuset.cpus has no impact to excpus */
> + if (cs_is_member(cs))
> + cpumask_and(excpus, trialcs->exclusive_cpus,
> + parent->effective_xcpus);
> + else
> + cpumask_and(excpus, user_xcpus(trialcs), parent->effective_xcpus);
> +
> return rm_siblings_excl_cpus(parent, cs, excpus);
> }
>
> @@ -2348,6 +2359,19 @@ static void update_sibling_cpumasks(struct cpuset *parent, struct cpuset *cs,
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> +static int parse_cpuset_cpulist(const char *buf, struct cpumask *out_mask)
> +{
> + int retval;
> +
> + retval = cpulist_parse(buf, out_mask);
> + if (retval < 0)
> + return retval;
> + if (!cpumask_subset(out_mask, top_cpuset.cpus_allowed))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * update_cpumask - update the cpus_allowed mask of a cpuset and all tasks in it
> * @cs: the cpuset to consider
> @@ -2364,34 +2388,9 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
> bool force = false;
> int old_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
>
> - /*
> - * An empty cpus_allowed is ok only if the cpuset has no tasks.
> - * Since cpulist_parse() fails on an empty mask, we special case
> - * that parsing. The validate_change() call ensures that cpusets
> - * with tasks have cpus.
> - */
> - if (!*buf) {
> - cpumask_clear(trialcs->cpus_allowed);
> - if (cpumask_empty(trialcs->exclusive_cpus))
> - cpumask_clear(trialcs->effective_xcpus);
> - } else {
> - retval = cpulist_parse(buf, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
> - if (retval < 0)
> - return retval;
> -
> - if (!cpumask_subset(trialcs->cpus_allowed,
> - top_cpuset.cpus_allowed))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - /*
> - * When exclusive_cpus isn't explicitly set, it is constrained
> - * by cpus_allowed and parent's effective_xcpus. Otherwise,
> - * trialcs->effective_xcpus is used as a temporary cpumask
> - * for checking validity of the partition root.
> - */
> - if (!cpumask_empty(trialcs->exclusive_cpus) || is_partition_valid(cs))
> - compute_trialcs_excpus(trialcs, cs);
> - }
> + retval = parse_cpuset_cpulist(buf, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
> + if (retval < 0)
> + return retval;
>
> /* Nothing to do if the cpus didn't change */
> if (cpumask_equal(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed))
> @@ -2400,6 +2399,8 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
> if (alloc_tmpmasks(&tmp))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + compute_trialcs_excpus(trialcs, cs);
> +
> if (old_prs) {
> if (is_partition_valid(cs) &&
> cpumask_empty(trialcs->effective_xcpus)) {
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 3:32 [PATCH -next RFC -v2 00/11] Refactor cpus mask setting Chen Ridong
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 01/11] cpuset: move the root cpuset write check earlier Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:43 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 02/11] cpuset: remove unused assignment to trialcs->partition_root_state Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:44 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 03/11] cpuset: change return type of is_partition_[in]valid to bool Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:44 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 04/11] cpuset: Refactor exclusive CPU mask computation logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:47 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 05/11] cpuset: refactor CPU mask buffer parsing logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:49 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 06/11] cpuset: introduce cpus_excl_conflict and mems_excl_conflict helpers Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:42 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16 7:59 ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 07/11] cpuset: refactor out validate_partition Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:53 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 08/11] cpuset: refactor cpus_allowed_validate_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:05 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 09/11] cpuset: refactor partition_cpus_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:34 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16 8:01 ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 10/11] cpuset: use parse_cpulist for setting cpus.exclusive Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:39 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 11/11] cpuset: use partition_cpus_change for setting exclusive cpus Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 20:05 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16 8:02 ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 11:18 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 00/11] Refactor cpus mask setting Chen Ridong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dfc4da47-2694-4470-ba14-ee62b91e52e0@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox