Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
	tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC -v2 09/11] cpuset: refactor partition_cpus_change
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:01:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fbd1880-4065-4e08-852d-c98316e245ab@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3815a523-a6d1-4612-8ec8-b955694a5792@redhat.com>



On 2025/9/16 3:34, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 9/8/25 11:32 PM, Chen Ridong wrote:
>> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>>
>> Refactor the partition_cpus_change function to handle both regular CPU
>> set updates and exclusive CPU modifications, either of which may trigger
>> partition state changes. This generalized function will also be utilized
>> for exclusive CPU updates in subsequent patches.
>>
>> With the introduction of compute_trialcs_excpus in a previous patch,
>> the trialcs->effective_xcpus field is now consistently computed and
>> maintained. Consequently, the legacy logic which assigned
>> **trialcs->allowed_cpus to a local 'xcpus' variable** when
>> trialcs->effective_xcpus was empty has been removed.
>>
>> This removal is safe because when trialcs is not a partition member,
>> trialcs->effective_xcpus is now correctly populated with the intersection
>> of user_xcpus and the parent's effective_xcpus. This calculation inherently
>> covers the scenario previously handled by the removed code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> index 6aa93bd9d5dd..de61520f1e44 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> @@ -2453,6 +2453,45 @@ static int cpus_allowed_validate_change(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset
>> *trialc
>>       return retval;
>>   }
>>   +/**
>> + * partition_cpus_change - Handle partition state changes due to CPU mask updates
>> + * @cs: The target cpuset being modified
>> + * @trialcs: The trial cpuset containing proposed configuration changes
>> + * @tmp: Temporary masks for intermediate calculations
>> + *
>> + * This function handles partition state transitions triggered by CPU mask changes.
>> + * CPU modifications may cause a partition to be disabled or require state updates.
>> + */
>> +static void partition_cpus_change(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
>> +                    struct tmpmasks *tmp)
>> +{
>> +    enum prs_errcode prs_err;
>> +
>> +    if (cs_is_member(cs))
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    prs_err = validate_partition(cs, trialcs);
>> +    if (prs_err) {
>> +        trialcs->prs_err = prs_err;
>> +        cs->prs_err = prs_err;
>> +    }
> 
> The assignment can be simplified into
> 
>     trialcs->prs_err = cs->prs_err = prs_err;
> 

Thank you, will update.

>> +
>> +    if (is_remote_partition(cs)) {
>> +        if (trialcs->prs_err)
>> +            remote_partition_disable(cs, tmp);
>> +        else
>> +            remote_cpus_update(cs, trialcs->exclusive_cpus,
>> +                       trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp);
>> +    } else {
>> +        if (trialcs->prs_err)
>> +            update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_invalidate,
>> +                            NULL, tmp);
>> +        else
>> +            update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_update,
>> +                            trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * update_cpumask - update the cpus_allowed mask of a cpuset and all tasks in it
>>    * @cs: the cpuset to consider
>> @@ -2466,7 +2505,6 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
>>       struct tmpmasks tmp;
>>       bool force = false;
>>       int old_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
>> -    enum prs_errcode prs_err;
>>         retval = parse_cpuset_cpulist(buf, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
>>       if (retval < 0)
>> @@ -2491,31 +2529,7 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
>>        */
>>       force = !cpumask_equal(cs->effective_xcpus, trialcs->effective_xcpus);
>>   -    prs_err = validate_partition(cs, trialcs);
>> -    if (prs_err) {
>> -        trialcs->prs_err = prs_err;
>> -        cs->prs_err = prs_err;
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    if (is_partition_valid(cs) ||
>> -       (is_partition_invalid(cs) && !trialcs->prs_err)) {
>> -        struct cpumask *xcpus = trialcs->effective_xcpus;
>> -
>> -        if (cpumask_empty(xcpus) && is_partition_invalid(cs))
>> -            xcpus = trialcs->cpus_allowed;
>> -
>> -        /*
>> -         * Call remote_cpus_update() to handle valid remote partition
>> -         */
>> -        if (is_remote_partition(cs))
>> -            remote_cpus_update(cs, NULL, xcpus, &tmp);
>> -        else if (trialcs->prs_err)
>> -            update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_invalidate,
>> -                            NULL, &tmp);
>> -        else
>> -            update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd_update,
>> -                            xcpus, &tmp);
>> -    }
>> +    partition_cpus_change(cs, trialcs, &tmp);
>>         spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
>>       cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

-- 
Best regards,
Ridong


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-09  3:32 [PATCH -next RFC -v2 00/11] Refactor cpus mask setting Chen Ridong
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 01/11] cpuset: move the root cpuset write check earlier Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:43   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 02/11] cpuset: remove unused assignment to trialcs->partition_root_state Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:44   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 03/11] cpuset: change return type of is_partition_[in]valid to bool Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:44   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 04/11] cpuset: Refactor exclusive CPU mask computation logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:47   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 05/11] cpuset: refactor CPU mask buffer parsing logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:49   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 06/11] cpuset: introduce cpus_excl_conflict and mems_excl_conflict helpers Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:42   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16  7:59     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 07/11] cpuset: refactor out validate_partition Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 18:53   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 08/11] cpuset: refactor cpus_allowed_validate_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:05   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 09/11] cpuset: refactor partition_cpus_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:34   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16  8:01     ` Chen Ridong [this message]
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 10/11] cpuset: use parse_cpulist for setting cpus.exclusive Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 19:39   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-09  3:32 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 11/11] cpuset: use partition_cpus_change for setting exclusive cpus Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 20:05   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-16  8:02     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-15 11:18 ` [PATCH -next RFC -v2 00/11] Refactor cpus mask setting Chen Ridong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3fbd1880-4065-4e08-852d-c98316e245ab@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox