From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Qais Yousef" <qyousef@layalina.io>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Swapnil Sapkal" <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
"Shrikanth Hegde" <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
"Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] sched/deadline: Rebuild root domain accounting after every update
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:53:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <724e00ea-eb27-46f1-acc3-465c04ffc84d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fb20de6-46a6-4e87-932e-dfc915fff3dc@redhat.com>
On 11/03/2025 15:51, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 3/11/25 9:29 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 11/03/2025 13:34, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> On 3/11/25 7:59 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>>> On 10/03/25 20:16, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/25 3:18 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/25 2:54 PM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/03/2025 10:37, Juri Lelli wrote:
[...]
>> Testcase: suspend/resume
>>
>> on Arm64 big.LITTLE cpumask=[LITTLE][big]=[0,3-5][1-2]
>> plus cmd line option 'isolcpus=3,4'.
>>
>> with Waiman's snippet:
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fd4d6143-9bd2-4a7c-80dc-1e19e4d1b2d1@redhat.com
>>
>> ...
>> [ 234.831675] --- > partition_sched_domains_locked() reset_domain=1
>> [ 234.835966] psci: CPU4 killed (polled 0 ms)
>> [ 234.838912] Error taking CPU3 down: -16
>> [ 234.838952] Non-boot CPUs are not disabled
>> [ 234.838986] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> ...
>>
>> IIRC, that's the old DL accounting issue.
>
> You are right. cpuhp_tasks_frozen will be set in the suspend/resume
> case. In that case, we do need to add a cpuset helper to acquire the
> cpuset_mutex. A test patch as follows (no testing done yet):
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> index c414daa7d503..ef1ffb9c52b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ extern void dl_rebuild_rd_accounting(void);
> extern void rebuild_sched_domains(void);
>
> extern void cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed(void);
> +extern void cpuset_reset_sched_domains(void)
>
> /*
> * read_mems_allowed_begin is required when making decisions involving
> @@ -269,6 +270,11 @@ static inline void rebuild_sched_domains(void)
> partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
> }
>
> +static inline void cpuset_reset_sched_domains(void)
> +{
> + partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> static inline void cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed(void)
> {
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 7995cd58a01b..a51099e5d587 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1076,6 +1076,13 @@ void rebuild_sched_domains(void)
> cpus_read_unlock();
> }
>
> +void cpuset_reset_sched_domains(void)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
> + partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
> + mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask - Update the cpumasks of tasks in the
> cpuset.
> * @cs: the cpuset in which each task's cpus_allowed mask needs to be
> changed
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 58593f4d09a1..dbf44ddbb6b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -8183,7 +8183,7 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_active(void)
> * operation in the resume sequence, just build a single
> sched
> * domain, ignoring cpusets.
> */
> - partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
> + cpuset_reset_sched_domains();
> if (--num_cpus_frozen)
> return;
> /*
> @@ -8202,7 +8202,7 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
> cpuset_update_active_cpus();
> } else {
> num_cpus_frozen++;
> - partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
> + cpuset_reset_sched_domains();
> }
> }
This seems to work. But what about a !CONFIG_CPUSETS build. In this case
we won't have this DL accounting update during suspend/resume since
dl_rebuild_rd_accounting() is empty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 9:19 [PATCH v3 0/8] Fix SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth accounting during suspend Juri Lelli
2025-03-10 9:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] sched/deadline: Ignore special tasks when rebuilding domains Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10 9:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] sched/deadline: Generalize unique visiting of root domains Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10 9:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] sched/deadline: Rebuild root domain accounting after every update Juri Lelli
2025-03-10 18:54 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-03-10 19:18 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-11 0:16 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-11 11:59 ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-11 12:34 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-11 13:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-03-11 14:51 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-12 9:53 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2025-03-12 10:09 ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:55 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-12 14:11 ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 16:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-03-12 16:51 ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-13 9:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-03-10 9:38 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] sched/topology: Remove redundant dl_clear_root_domain call Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] cgroup/cpuset: Remove partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10 9:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] sched/topology: Stop exposing partition_sched_domains_locked Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10 9:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] include/{topology,cpuset}: Move dl_rebuild_rd_accounting to cpuset.h Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32 ` Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=724e00ea-eb27-46f1-acc3-465c04ffc84d@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox