Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Qais Yousef" <qyousef@layalina.io>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Swapnil Sapkal" <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
	"Shrikanth Hegde" <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
	luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
	"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] sched/deadline: Rebuild root domain accounting after every update
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:53:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <724e00ea-eb27-46f1-acc3-465c04ffc84d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fb20de6-46a6-4e87-932e-dfc915fff3dc@redhat.com>

On 11/03/2025 15:51, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 3/11/25 9:29 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 11/03/2025 13:34, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> On 3/11/25 7:59 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>>> On 10/03/25 20:16, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/25 3:18 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/25 2:54 PM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/03/2025 10:37, Juri Lelli wrote:

[...]

>> Testcase: suspend/resume
>>
>> on Arm64 big.LITTLE cpumask=[LITTLE][big]=[0,3-5][1-2]
>> plus cmd line option 'isolcpus=3,4'.
>>
>> with Waiman's snippet:
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fd4d6143-9bd2-4a7c-80dc-1e19e4d1b2d1@redhat.com
>>
>> ...
>> [  234.831675] --- > partition_sched_domains_locked() reset_domain=1
>> [  234.835966] psci: CPU4 killed (polled 0 ms)
>> [  234.838912] Error taking CPU3 down: -16
>> [  234.838952] Non-boot CPUs are not disabled
>> [  234.838986] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> ...
>>
>> IIRC, that's the old DL accounting issue.
> 
> You are right. cpuhp_tasks_frozen will be set in the suspend/resume
> case. In that case, we do need to add a cpuset helper to acquire the
> cpuset_mutex. A test patch as follows (no testing done yet):
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> index c414daa7d503..ef1ffb9c52b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ extern void dl_rebuild_rd_accounting(void);
>  extern void rebuild_sched_domains(void);
> 
>  extern void cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed(void);
> +extern void cpuset_reset_sched_domains(void)
> 
>  /*
>   * read_mems_allowed_begin is required when making decisions involving
> @@ -269,6 +270,11 @@ static inline void rebuild_sched_domains(void)
>         partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
>  }
> 
> +static inline void cpuset_reset_sched_domains(void)
> +{
> +       partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed(void)
>  {
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 7995cd58a01b..a51099e5d587 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1076,6 +1076,13 @@ void rebuild_sched_domains(void)
>         cpus_read_unlock();
>  }
> 
> +void cpuset_reset_sched_domains(void)
> +{
> +       mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
> +       partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
> +       mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask - Update the cpumasks of tasks in the
> cpuset.
>   * @cs: the cpuset in which each task's cpus_allowed mask needs to be
> changed
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 58593f4d09a1..dbf44ddbb6b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -8183,7 +8183,7 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_active(void)
>                  * operation in the resume sequence, just build a single
> sched
>                  * domain, ignoring cpusets.
>                  */
> -               partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
> +               cpuset_reset_sched_domains();
>                 if (--num_cpus_frozen)
>                         return;
>                 /*
> @@ -8202,7 +8202,7 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
>                 cpuset_update_active_cpus();
>         } else {
>                 num_cpus_frozen++;
> -               partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
> +               cpuset_reset_sched_domains();
>         }
>  }

This seems to work. But what about a !CONFIG_CPUSETS build. In this case
we won't have this DL accounting update during suspend/resume since
dl_rebuild_rd_accounting() is empty.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-12  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-10  9:19 [PATCH v3 0/8] Fix SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth accounting during suspend Juri Lelli
2025-03-10  9:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] sched/deadline: Ignore special tasks when rebuilding domains Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32   ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32   ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10  9:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] sched/deadline: Generalize unique visiting of root domains Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32   ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] sched/deadline: Rebuild root domain accounting after every update Juri Lelli
2025-03-10 18:54   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-03-10 19:18     ` Waiman Long
2025-03-11  0:16       ` Waiman Long
2025-03-11 11:59         ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-11 12:34           ` Waiman Long
2025-03-11 13:29             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-03-11 14:51               ` Waiman Long
2025-03-12  9:53                 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2025-03-12 10:09                   ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:55                     ` Waiman Long
2025-03-12 14:11                       ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 16:29                         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-03-12 16:51                           ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-13  9:09                             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-03-10  9:38 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] sched/topology: Remove redundant dl_clear_root_domain call Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32   ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10  9:39 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] cgroup/cpuset: Remove partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32   ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10  9:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] sched/topology: Stop exposing partition_sched_domains_locked Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32   ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-10  9:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] include/{topology,cpuset}: Move dl_rebuild_rd_accounting to cpuset.h Juri Lelli
2025-03-12 13:32   ` Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=724e00ea-eb27-46f1-acc3-465c04ffc84d@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox