public inbox for cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
@ 2013-12-07 12:30 bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-07 13:50 ` [Bug 66751] " bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-07 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cpufreq

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751

            Bug ID: 66751
           Summary: Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
           Product: Power Management
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: v3.13-rc3
          Hardware: x86-64
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: high
          Priority: P1
         Component: cpufreq
          Assignee: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
          Reporter: ziegler@uni-freiburg.de
        Regression: No

Created attachment 117791
  --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=117791&action=edit
config for 3.13-rc3

This is on a Thinkpad T510. If a try to wake up the machine from suspend,
only the start button light changes from "blink" to "on". The screen remains
black and the machine is unresponsive. All I can do is a hard reboot by holding
down the start button.

I bisected between  v3.13-rc2 and v3.13-rc3 and got 

 commit 2167e2399dc5e69c62db56d933e9c8cbe107620a
 Author: Bj√∏rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
 Date:   Tue Dec 3 12:14:32 2013 +0100

    cpufreq: fix garbage kobjects on errors during suspend/resume

as the first bad commit

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug 66751] Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
  2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-07 13:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-07 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-07 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cpufreq

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751

--- Comment #1 from Martin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de> ---
reverting 2167e2399dc5e69c62db56d933e9c8cbe107620a solves the problem

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug 66751] Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
  2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-07 13:50 ` [Bug 66751] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-07 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-09 13:41 ` [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does " bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-07 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cpufreq

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751

Martin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Regression|No                          |Yes

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
  2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-07 13:50 ` [Bug 66751] " bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-07 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-09 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-09 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-09 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cpufreq

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751

Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
                   |                            |bjorn@mork.no
            Summary|Does not resume from        |[BISECTED]Does not resume
                   |suspend (bisected)          |from suspend (bisected)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
  2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-12-09 13:41 ` [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-09 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-09 14:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-09 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cpufreq

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751

--- Comment #2 from Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> ---
Adding Bj√∏rn to the cc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
  2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-12-09 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-09 14:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-10  6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-10  6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-09 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cpufreq

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751

--- Comment #3 from Bj√∏rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> ---
Yes, this is a pretty interesting one. The bug is caused by the combination of
two commits added between -rc2 and -rc3:

 5a87182aa21d cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate
 2167e2399dc5 cpufreq: fix garbage kobjects on errors during suspend/resume

The order these are applied is really arbitrary, and the bisect will point to
the last one applied. Which happens to be 2167e2399dc5. But I will still claim
that it was commit 5a87182aa21d that caused this bug by adding even more
special handling of cpufreq suspend.  This needs to be done properly if it is
done at all, including hooks for drivers and governors. Adding special cases
and "if suspending" tests here and there with subtle implicit dependencies
between the different code blocks is not going to fly.

Note that reverting only 5a87182aa21d will fix the problem, with simpler code
and no dangling sysfs files as a result.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
  2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-12-09 14:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-10  6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2013-12-10  6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-10  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cpufreq

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751

Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |tianyu.lan@intel.com
         Resolution|---                         |PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE

--- Comment #4 from Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> ---
Both Commit 2167e2399dc5 and 5a87182aa21d have been reverted in the linux-pm
tree. bleeding-edge branch. So close this bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
  2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-12-10  6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-10  6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-10  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cpufreq

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751

Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-10  6:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-07 13:50 ` [Bug 66751] " bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-07 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-09 13:41 ` [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does " bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-09 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-09 14:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10  6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10  6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox