* [Bug 66751] Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-07 13:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-07 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-07 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
--- Comment #1 from Martin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de> ---
reverting 2167e2399dc5e69c62db56d933e9c8cbe107620a solves the problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 66751] Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-07 13:50 ` [Bug 66751] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-07 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-09 13:41 ` [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does " bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-07 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
Martin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regression|No |Yes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-07 13:50 ` [Bug 66751] " bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-07 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-09 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-09 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-09 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
| |bjorn@mork.no
Summary|Does not resume from |[BISECTED]Does not resume
|suspend (bisected) |from suspend (bisected)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-09 13:41 ` [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-09 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-09 14:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-09 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
--- Comment #2 from Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> ---
Adding Bj√∏rn to the cc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-09 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-09 14:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10 6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10 6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-09 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
--- Comment #3 from Bj√∏rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> ---
Yes, this is a pretty interesting one. The bug is caused by the combination of
two commits added between -rc2 and -rc3:
5a87182aa21d cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate
2167e2399dc5 cpufreq: fix garbage kobjects on errors during suspend/resume
The order these are applied is really arbitrary, and the bisect will point to
the last one applied. Which happens to be 2167e2399dc5. But I will still claim
that it was commit 5a87182aa21d that caused this bug by adding even more
special handling of cpufreq suspend. This needs to be done properly if it is
done at all, including hooks for drivers and governors. Adding special cases
and "if suspending" tests here and there with subtle implicit dependencies
between the different code blocks is not going to fly.
Note that reverting only 5a87182aa21d will fix the problem, with simpler code
and no dangling sysfs files as a result.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-09 14:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-10 6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10 6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-10 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |tianyu.lan@intel.com
Resolution|--- |PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE
--- Comment #4 from Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> ---
Both Commit 2167e2399dc5 and 5a87182aa21d have been reverted in the linux-pm
tree. bleeding-edge branch. So close this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug 66751] [BISECTED]Does not resume from suspend (bisected)
2013-12-07 12:30 [Bug 66751] New: Does not resume from suspend (bisected) bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-10 6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-10 6:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-10 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66751
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread