DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for()
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:25:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260718002544.2C7741F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718001442.87129-6-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] If `damos_commit_dests()` fails to allocate the `weight_arr` array, it returns `-ENOMEM` but leaves the `dst` context partially modified with a NULL `weight_arr` and an incorrect `nr_dests`, leading to a NULL pointer dereference during DAMOS scheme execution.
- [Medium] Missing out-of-bounds array bounds checks in the test functions `damos_test_commit_quota_goals_for()` and `damon_test_commit_target_regions_for()` when iterating over tested items.
--

--- Patch [5]: [PATCH 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for() ---
commit 937f902e215bffeba8d97bcc0725b5bfbb643c41
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for()

This patch fixes a potential out-of-bounds access in the KUnit tests for
damos_commit_dests(). It exits early in damos_test_commit_dests_for()
if the expected number of destinations does not match the actual number.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260713144757.39740-1-sj@kernel.org

> diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> index eddf3a0484583..9b8c20a50ad53 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> @@ -1008,6 +1008,8 @@ static void damos_test_commit_dests_for(struct kunit *test,
>  	skip = false;
>  
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dst.nr_dests, src_nr_dests);
> +	if (dst.nr_dests != src_nr_dests)
> +		goto out;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at the function being
tested, could damos_commit_dests() leave the destination context in a
corrupted state on allocation failure?

If kmalloc_array() fails to allocate weight_arr, it returns -ENOMEM but
leaves dst->weight_arr as NULL without resetting dst->nr_dests:

mm/damon/core.c:damos_commit_dests() {
	...
		dst->weight_arr = kmalloc_array(src->nr_dests,
			sizeof(*dst->weight_arr), GFP_KERNEL);
		if (!dst->weight_arr) {
			/* ->node_id_arr will be freed by scheme destruction */
			return -ENOMEM;
		}
	}
	...
}

Would a subsequent execution in damos_va_migrate_dests_add() dereference this
NULL array when iterating over dst->nr_dests, leading to a system crash?

[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the same out-of-bounds array access
vulnerability exist in other test functions in this file?

Similar to the fix applied here, the loops in
damos_test_commit_quota_goals_for() and
damon_test_commit_target_regions_for() iterate over items without bounds
checking, only verifying the length after the loop completes.

For example, in damos_test_commit_quota_goals_for():

mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h:damos_test_commit_quota_goals_for() {
	...
	damos_for_each_quota_goal(goal, &dst->quota) {
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, goal->metric, src_goals[i].metric);
		...
	}
	...
}

Could these loops exceed the bounds of arrays like src_goals[] or
expect_start_end[] if the tested function produces more elements than
expected?

>  	for (i = 0; i < dst.nr_dests; i++) {
>  		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dst.node_id_arr[i], src_node_id_arr[i]);
>  		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dst.weight_arr[i], src_weight_arr[i]);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260718001442.87129-1-sj@kernel.org?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-18  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-18  0:14 [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  0:53     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  0:55     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm/damon/vaddr-kunit: check region count in three_regions test SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: handle region split failure in filter_out() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  1:00     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:25   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-18  1:01     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  1:02     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong region walk in commit_target_regions() SJ Park
2026-07-18  1:13 ` [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-17  0:30 SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for() SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260718002544.2C7741F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox