From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:02:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260718010222.90262-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718002258.6A3851F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:22:57 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [Medium] Out-of-bounds array read in damon_test_commit_target_regions_for() due to missing region count validation before traversing dst_target.
> --
>
> --- Patch [6]: [PATCH 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals() ---
> commit 4bcb5123bbb5f6b4908f1d776a8608ef05a89501
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
> Subject: mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals()
>
> This commit addresses an out-of-bounds array access in the KUnit test
> damos_test_commit_quota_goals_for(). If the number of created quota goals
> does not match the expected count, blindly traversing them can cause the test
> to read past the bounds of the expected values array. The patch adds a count
> validation and an early exit to avoid this invalid traversal.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260713144757.39740-1-sj@kernel.org
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> > index 9b8c20a50ad53..fbf986aee2dea 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> > +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> > @@ -861,6 +862,14 @@ static void damos_test_commit_quota_goals_for(struct kunit *test,
> >
> > damos_commit_quota_goals(&dst, &src);
> >
> > + damos_for_each_quota_goal(goal, &dst)
> > + nr_dst++;
> > + damos_for_each_quota_goal(goal, &src)
> > + nr_src++;
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_dst, nr_src);
> > + if (nr_dst != nr_src)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > i = 0;
> > damos_for_each_quota_goal(goal, (&dst)) {
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, goal->metric, src_goals[i].metric);
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but should a similar early exit
> check be added to damon_test_commit_target_regions_for() to prevent an
> out-of-bounds read?
>
> Just like the issue fixed here, damon_test_commit_target_regions_for()
> iterates over dst_target regions without validating the region count against
> nr_expect_regions first:
>
> mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h:damon_test_commit_target_regions_for() {
> ...
> damon_commit_target_regions(dst_target, src_target, 1);
> i = 0;
> damon_for_each_region(r, dst_target) {
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, expect_start_end[i][0]);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, expect_start_end[i][1]);
> i++;
> }
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(dst_target), nr_expect_regions);
> ...
> }
>
> If damon_commit_target_regions() incorrectly leaves more regions in dst_target
> than nr_expect_regions, the loop will read past the end of the
> expect_start_end[] array before reaching the KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ count validation
> at the end of the function.
Yes, and another patch in this series fixes it.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260718001442.87129-1-sj@kernel.org?part=6
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-18 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-18 0:14 [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 0:53 ` SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 0:55 ` SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm/damon/vaddr-kunit: check region count in three_regions test SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: handle region split failure in filter_out() SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 1:00 ` SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for() SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 1:01 ` SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals() SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 1:02 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong region walk in commit_target_regions() SJ Park
2026-07-18 1:13 ` [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-17 0:30 SJ Park
2026-07-17 0:30 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals() SJ Park
2026-07-17 0:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 1:23 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260718010222.90262-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox