DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:32:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260718003220.DEDC31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718001442.87129-2-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Uninitialized memory use in DAMOS quota goals allocation (last_psi_total and nid).
- [High] damos_quota_init() modifies the passed quota struct, unintentionally resetting runtime quota statistics of actively running schemes.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied ---
commit 316d27ac2ea17607b5c9df656020658fa1b425df
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied

This commit initializes the last_applied field of the damos scheme struct to
NULL in damon_new_scheme(). This prevents an uninitialized value from causing
a DAMON scheme to unexpectedly skip applying an action to a folio the very
first time.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260714055436.120034-1-sj@kernel.org

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 603b102ff80f9..20d267c615faf 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -705,6 +705,7 @@ struct damos *damon_new_scheme(struct damos_access_pattern *pattern,
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scheme->ops_filters);
>  	scheme->stat = (struct damos_stat){};
>  	scheme->max_nr_snapshots = 0;
> +	scheme->last_applied = NULL;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scheme->list);
>  
>  	scheme->quota = *(damos_quota_init(quota));

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does damos_quota_init() unintentionally reset 
the runtime statistics of actively running schemes?

When updating a DAMON context via sysfs, damon_commit_ctx() calls 
damon_new_test_ctx() which iterates over running schemes and calls 
damon_new_scheme(), passing the active &src_scheme->quota pointer.

Inside damon_new_scheme(), it executes:
scheme->quota = *(damos_quota_init(quota));

If damos_quota_init() directly modifies the passed pointer:

mm/damon/core.c:damos_quota_init() {
    quota->esz = 0;
    quota->total_charged_sz = 0;
    quota->total_charged_ns = 0;
    quota->charged_sz = 0;
    ...
}

It appears this silently clears the tracking variables of the actively running 
scheme, potentially breaking the ability to track memory usage limits.

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing initialization,
I noticed a potential issue with quota goals. Are the metric-specific fields in
damos_new_quota_goal() left uninitialized?

When allocating a new goal via sysfs or damon_commit_ctx():

mm/damon/core.c:damos_new_quota_goal() {
    ...
    goal = kmalloc_obj(*goal);
    ...
}

It seems fields like last_psi_total and nid are not zero-initialized.

Later, damos_commit_quota_goal_union() misses the switch case for 
DAMOS_QUOTA_NODE_ELIGIBLE_MEM_BP, leaving dst->nid uninitialized.

This can result in using garbage values when calculating current_value:

mm/damon/core.c:damos_set_quota_goal_current_value() {
    ...
    goal->current_value = damos_get_node_eligible_mem_bp(c, s, goal->nid);
    ...
}

And for PSI goals:

mm/damon/core.c:damos_set_quota_goal_current_value() {
    ...
    goal->current_value = now_psi_total - goal->last_psi_total;
    goal->last_psi_total = now_psi_total;
    ...
}

Could subtracting an uninitialized last_psi_total underflow and cause the 
quota tuner to aggressively zero out the quota?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260718001442.87129-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-18  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-18  0:14 [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:32   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-18  0:53     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  0:55     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm/damon/vaddr-kunit: check region count in three_regions test SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: handle region split failure in filter_out() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  1:00     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  1:01     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  1:02     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong region walk in commit_target_regions() SJ Park
2026-07-18  1:13 ` [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-17  0:30 SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17  1:12     ` SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260718003220.DEDC31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox