From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:53:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260718005316.89585-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718003220.DEDC31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:32:20 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Uninitialized memory use in DAMOS quota goals allocation (last_psi_total and nid).
> - [High] damos_quota_init() modifies the passed quota struct, unintentionally resetting runtime quota statistics of actively running schemes.
> --
>
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied ---
> commit 316d27ac2ea17607b5c9df656020658fa1b425df
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied
>
> This commit initializes the last_applied field of the damos scheme struct to
> NULL in damon_new_scheme(). This prevents an uninitialized value from causing
> a DAMON scheme to unexpectedly skip applying an action to a folio the very
> first time.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260714055436.120034-1-sj@kernel.org
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > index 603b102ff80f9..20d267c615faf 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> > @@ -705,6 +705,7 @@ struct damos *damon_new_scheme(struct damos_access_pattern *pattern,
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scheme->ops_filters);
> > scheme->stat = (struct damos_stat){};
> > scheme->max_nr_snapshots = 0;
> > + scheme->last_applied = NULL;
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scheme->list);
> >
> > scheme->quota = *(damos_quota_init(quota));
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but does damos_quota_init() unintentionally reset
> the runtime statistics of actively running schemes?
>
> When updating a DAMON context via sysfs, damon_commit_ctx() calls
> damon_new_test_ctx() which iterates over running schemes and calls
> damon_new_scheme(), passing the active &src_scheme->quota pointer.
>
> Inside damon_new_scheme(), it executes:
> scheme->quota = *(damos_quota_init(quota));
>
> If damos_quota_init() directly modifies the passed pointer:
>
> mm/damon/core.c:damos_quota_init() {
> quota->esz = 0;
> quota->total_charged_sz = 0;
> quota->total_charged_ns = 0;
> quota->charged_sz = 0;
> ...
> }
>
> It appears this silently clears the tracking variables of the actively running
> scheme, potentially breaking the ability to track memory usage limits.
No. The damon_new_scheme() is for a case the commit is adding new scheme to
the destination context. There is no data to erase.
>
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing initialization,
> I noticed a potential issue with quota goals. Are the metric-specific fields in
> damos_new_quota_goal() left uninitialized?
>
> When allocating a new goal via sysfs or damon_commit_ctx():
>
> mm/damon/core.c:damos_new_quota_goal() {
> ...
> goal = kmalloc_obj(*goal);
> ...
> }
>
> It seems fields like last_psi_total and nid are not zero-initialized.
>
> Later, damos_commit_quota_goal_union() misses the switch case for
> DAMOS_QUOTA_NODE_ELIGIBLE_MEM_BP, leaving dst->nid uninitialized.
>
> This can result in using garbage values when calculating current_value:
>
> mm/damon/core.c:damos_set_quota_goal_current_value() {
> ...
> goal->current_value = damos_get_node_eligible_mem_bp(c, s, goal->nid);
> ...
> }
This is no issue. The caller should set the nid. And core functions using the
nid validates it before really using it.
>
> And for PSI goals:
>
> mm/damon/core.c:damos_set_quota_goal_current_value() {
> ...
> goal->current_value = now_psi_total - goal->last_psi_total;
> goal->last_psi_total = now_psi_total;
> ...
> }
>
> Could subtracting an uninitialized last_psi_total underflow and cause the
> quota tuner to aggressively zero out the quota?
Good finding. I will separately fix this.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260718001442.87129-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-18 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-18 0:14 [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 0:53 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 0:55 ` SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm/damon/vaddr-kunit: check region count in three_regions test SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: handle region split failure in filter_out() SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 1:00 ` SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for() SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 1:01 ` SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals() SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 1:02 ` SJ Park
2026-07-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong region walk in commit_target_regions() SJ Park
2026-07-18 1:13 ` [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-17 0:30 SJ Park
2026-07-17 0:30 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-17 0:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 1:12 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260718005316.89585-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox