From: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@gmail.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: multipath: change the DEFAULT_MINIO for the request based multipath
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:46:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295621193.23625.37.camel@zezette> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110121141204.GE30411@redhat.com>
> I'm not following why we'd need a different configuration parameter.
> It is just that the default rr_min_io that would be used would be
> conditional on the multipath target version being >= 1.1.0.
>
Defaults are layered. For current minio, we have :
[1] one top level default (hardcoded, superseded by config)
[2] per hardware default (hardcoded, superseded by config)
[3] per multipath value (none hardcoded, defined by config)
You suggest multipath-tools to adapt only the top level minio default
depending on dm-rq availability [1], but what of the hwtable defaults
[2] ? Should we provide vendors with a way to describe a with-rq minio
default *and* a without-rq minio default (a new parameter in the hwentry
struct) ? If so, we should also provide a new config file keyword to
override this new hwentry parameter hardcoded value ... then the
reasoning cascades to the mpentry struct minio setting [3].
Actually, [1] is hardly the common case : only unknown hardware resort
to these defaults.
Is my reasoning flawed ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-19 21:30 [PATCH] [RFC] multipath: change the DEFAULT_MINIO for the request based multipath Malahal Naineni
2011-01-20 7:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-01-20 16:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-21 7:03 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-21 8:47 ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-01-21 14:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-21 14:46 ` Christophe Varoqui [this message]
2011-01-21 17:39 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-01-25 8:56 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-26 2:23 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-01-26 17:27 ` nishant mungse
2011-01-27 15:16 ` nishant mungse
2011-01-31 23:53 ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-02-01 2:21 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-02-01 3:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 8:14 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-02-01 8:13 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-02-01 9:00 ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-02-01 9:51 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-01-21 13:26 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295621193.23625.37.camel@zezette \
--to=christophe.varoqui@gmail.com \
--cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox