Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@gmail.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: multipath: change the DEFAULT_MINIO for the request based multipath
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:46:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295621193.23625.37.camel@zezette> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110121141204.GE30411@redhat.com>


> I'm not following why we'd need a different configuration parameter.
> It is just that the default rr_min_io that would be used would be
> conditional on the multipath target version being >= 1.1.0.
> 
Defaults are layered. For current minio, we have :
[1] one top level default (hardcoded, superseded by config)
[2] per hardware default (hardcoded, superseded by config)
[3] per multipath value (none hardcoded, defined by config)

You suggest multipath-tools to adapt only the top level minio default
depending on dm-rq availability [1], but what of the hwtable defaults
[2] ? Should we provide vendors with a way to describe a with-rq minio
default *and* a without-rq minio default (a new parameter in the hwentry
struct) ? If so, we should also provide a new config file keyword to
override this new hwentry parameter hardcoded value ... then the
reasoning cascades to the mpentry struct minio setting [3].

Actually, [1] is hardly the common case : only unknown hardware resort
to these defaults.

Is my reasoning flawed ?

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-21 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-19 21:30 [PATCH] [RFC] multipath: change the DEFAULT_MINIO for the request based multipath Malahal Naineni
2011-01-20  7:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-01-20 16:07   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-21  7:03     ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-21  8:47       ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-01-21 14:12         ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-21 14:46           ` Christophe Varoqui [this message]
2011-01-21 17:39             ` Malahal Naineni
2011-01-25  8:56               ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-26  2:23                 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-01-26 17:27                   ` nishant mungse
2011-01-27 15:16                     ` nishant mungse
2011-01-31 23:53                   ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-02-01  2:21                     ` Malahal Naineni
2011-02-01  3:13                       ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01  8:14                         ` Malahal Naineni
2011-02-01  8:13                     ` Malahal Naineni
2011-02-01  9:00                       ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-02-01  9:51                         ` Malahal Naineni
2011-01-21 13:26       ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1295621193.23625.37.camel@zezette \
    --to=christophe.varoqui@gmail.com \
    --cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox