From: Malahal Naineni <malahal@us.ibm.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: multipath: change the DEFAULT_MINIO for the request based multipath
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:21:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110201022120.GA24297@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296518031.6483.106.camel@zezette>
Christophe Varoqui [christophe.varoqui@gmail.com] wrote:
> I pushed an implementation of the fully capable solution.
>
> The behaviour is unchanged with dm-multipath <= 1.1.0
> For newer driver, if no additional config is added to multipath.conf the
> minio will be set to 1.
>
> If Mike S. tests prove this value is not always optimal, it can be tuned
> per device in hwtable (hwe->minio_rq) and overridden in multipath.conf
> device{} and multipath{} section.
>
> This seemed to be the most consistent behaviour, to me. But feel free to
> disagree.
>
> Please test carefully as the patch is quite invasive. I built and tested
> lightly with a NetApp iSCSI simulator. The session produced the
> following output
Where is the patch? I would like test it. I have a patch set that does
what I said and was planning on adding a field to hwentry structure
without adding a new config keyword in /etc/multipath.conf. It doesn't
appear that big a change, but would like to see your patch.
Thanks, Malahal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-01 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-19 21:30 [PATCH] [RFC] multipath: change the DEFAULT_MINIO for the request based multipath Malahal Naineni
2011-01-20 7:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-01-20 16:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-21 7:03 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-21 8:47 ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-01-21 14:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-21 14:46 ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-01-21 17:39 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-01-25 8:56 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-26 2:23 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-01-26 17:27 ` nishant mungse
2011-01-27 15:16 ` nishant mungse
2011-01-31 23:53 ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-02-01 2:21 ` Malahal Naineni [this message]
2011-02-01 3:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 8:14 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-02-01 8:13 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-02-01 9:00 ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-02-01 9:51 ` Malahal Naineni
2011-01-21 13:26 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110201022120.GA24297@us.ibm.com \
--to=malahal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox