From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe IRQ leak
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:29:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820132941.363511F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820-dma40-fixes-v2-8-63238334c707@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Hardware interrupt is requested before hardware initialization and Runtime PM enablement, creating a window for an immediate IRQ storm.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v2 08/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe IRQ leak ---
commit e1b29c17ec30abafeb3d5100e10a174f78b73842
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe IRQ leak
This commit fixes an IRQ leak in the probe error paths of the ste_dma40 driver
by tracking whether the IRQ was successfully requested and freeing it during
failure teardown.
Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260618051539.15E201F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5-5
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> index 0c9094b4c4ade..8cf73b37f8bfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3605,6 +3606,7 @@ static int __init d40_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> d40_err(dev, "No IRQ defined\n");
> goto destroy_cache;
> }
> + irq_requested = true;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does requesting the IRQ here create a
window for an immediate interrupt storm?
The interrupt is requested in d40_probe() before hardware initialization
(d40_hw_init()) and Runtime PM enablement (pm_runtime_enable()). If the
hardware interrupt is already asserted (for example, if left pending by a
bootloader), it will fire immediately.
Inside d40_handle_interrupt(), the handler checks Runtime PM status:
drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:d40_handle_interrupt() {
...
ret = pm_runtime_get_if_active(base->dev);
if (ret <= 0)
return IRQ_NONE;
...
}
Since pm_runtime_set_active() and pm_runtime_enable() have not yet been
executed in d40_probe(), Runtime PM is inactive. This causes the check to
fail, returning IRQ_NONE without servicing or clearing the hardware
interrupt.
For level-triggered interrupts, could this lead to an unhandled interrupt
storm that permanently disables the device's IRQ line?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820-dma40-fixes-v2-0-63238334c707@kernel.org?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 13:14 [PATCH v2 00/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe and allocation bugs Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix failed start cleanup Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Check runtime PM in IRQ Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Init hardware before registration Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix DMA registration unwind Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix LCLA allocation order Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe LCLA free Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe IRQ leak Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix memcpy channel parsing Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix logical channel bounds check Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix event group bounds Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Validate memcpy configuration Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] dmaengine: Use unique debugfs names Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260820132941.363511F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox