From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:29:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820132942.019D71F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820-dma40-fixes-v2-7-63238334c707@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] request_irq() is called before PM runtime is enabled, which can cause an IRQ storm if an interrupt is pending.
- [High] The driver systematically ignores the return value of pm_runtime_get_sync(), failing to handle resume errors.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v2 07/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable ---
commit 95c55fe7afd321bc228d4b1a735de2f4eb7a79fc
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable
This commit fixes an issue where some d40_probe() error paths disable
runtime PM even if it was never enabled for the device. It introduces a
boolean flag to track whether runtime PM was actually enabled, keeping the
disable_depth balanced during probe failures.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260618051539.15E201F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> index 739e47941d0cc..0c9094b4c4ade 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3633,6 +3634,7 @@ static int __init d40_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(base->dev);
> pm_runtime_set_active(base->dev);
> pm_runtime_enable(base->dev);
> + runtime_pm_enabled = true;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but request_irq() is called before PM
runtime is enabled, which could cause an IRQ storm if an interrupt is
pending.
If an interrupt triggers before runtime PM is enabled, the ISR
d40_handle_interrupt() fails to clear it:
d40_handle_interrupt() {
...
ret = pm_runtime_get_if_active(base->dev);
if (ret <= 0)
return IRQ_NONE;
...
}
Because pm_runtime_get_if_active() returns an error when runtime PM is
disabled, the handler returns IRQ_NONE without clearing the hardware
interrupt. This causes the interrupt to continually re-trigger.
Could the request_irq() call be moved after pm_runtime_enable() to
prevent this?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the driver systematically ignores the
return value of pm_runtime_get_sync().
If the device fails to resume due to PM subsystem issues or memory
pressure, does this cause the driver to access powered-off hardware
registers?
For example, in d40_queue_start():
d40_queue_start() {
...
pm_runtime_get_sync(d40c->base->dev);
/* hardware accesses follow */
...
}
Similar unchecked calls exist in d40_pause(), d40_resume(), and
d40_free_dma(). Could these be updated to check for negative error codes
and abort if the resume fails?
>
> dma_set_max_seg_size(base->dev, STEDMA40_MAX_SEG_SIZE);
>
> @@ -3678,7 +3680,8 @@ static int __init d40_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> regulator_disable(base->lcpa_regulator);
> regulator_put(base->lcpa_regulator);
> }
> - pm_runtime_disable(base->dev);
> + if (runtime_pm_enabled)
> + pm_runtime_disable(base->dev);
>
> report_failure:
> d40_err(dev, "probe failed\n");
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820-dma40-fixes-v2-0-63238334c707@kernel.org?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 13:14 [PATCH v2 00/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe and allocation bugs Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix failed start cleanup Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Check runtime PM in IRQ Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Init hardware before registration Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix DMA registration unwind Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix LCLA allocation order Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe LCLA free Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe IRQ leak Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix memcpy channel parsing Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix logical channel bounds check Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix event group bounds Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Validate memcpy configuration Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] dmaengine: Use unique debugfs names Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260820132942.019D71F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox