DMA Engine development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix logical channel bounds check
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:32:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820133207.B33F31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820-dma40-fixes-v2-10-63238334c707@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Changing DMA transfer direction after channel allocation corrupts allocation masks and leaks logical channels.
--

--- Patch [10]: [PATCH v2 10/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix logical channel bounds check ---
commit 77f491852f9c4972a650574c4a045eadf10238f0
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>

dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix logical channel bounds check

d40_validate_conf() checks the raw dev_type against num_log_chans, but
d40_allocate_channel() derives the lookup_log_chans index differently. This
commit validates the dev_type against the derived logical channel index limit
so channel allocation cannot write past lookup_log_chans.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260618051539.15E201F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> index 4e840846466b8..7c777e410c104 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> @@ -1737,15 +1737,26 @@ static int d40_validate_conf(struct d40_chan *d40c,
>  {
>  	int res = 0;
>  	bool is_log = conf->mode == STEDMA40_MODE_LOGICAL;
> +	bool invalid_dev_type = conf->dev_type < 0;
>  
>  	if (!conf->dir) {
>  		chan_err(d40c, "Invalid direction.\n");
>  		res = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	if ((is_log && conf->dev_type > d40c->base->num_log_chans)  ||
> -	    (!is_log && conf->dev_type > d40c->base->num_phy_chans) ||
> -	    (conf->dev_type < 0)) {
> +	if (!invalid_dev_type && is_log) {
> +		int max_dev_type;
> +
> +		if (conf->dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM)
> +			max_dev_type = DIV_ROUND_UP(d40c->base->num_log_chans, 2);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does changing the DMA transfer direction
after channel allocation corrupt allocation masks and leak logical channels?

If a DMA client allocates a channel configured for one direction (e.g.,
DMA_MEM_TO_DEV), and then prepares a transfer with the opposite direction,
drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:d40_set_runtime_config_write() updates the internal
direction:

    cfg->dir = DMA_DEV_TO_MEM;

Later, during channel release, drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:d40_free_dma() relies
on this mutated direction to determine which allocation mask to free:

    else if (d40c->dma_cfg.dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM)
        is_src = true;
    ...
    d40_alloc_mask_free(phy, is_src, chan_is_logical(d40c) ? event : 0);

Could this clear the bit in the wrong resource mask, leaking the originally
allocated resource and inadvertently freeing a mask that may be actively used
by another client?

> +		else
> +			max_dev_type = d40c->base->num_log_chans / 2;
> +
> +		invalid_dev_type = conf->dev_type >= max_dev_type;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (invalid_dev_type ||
> +	    (!is_log && conf->dev_type > d40c->base->num_phy_chans)) {
>  		chan_err(d40c, "Invalid device type (%d)\n", conf->dev_type);
>  		res = -EINVAL;
>  	}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820-dma40-fixes-v2-0-63238334c707@kernel.org?part=10

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-20 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-20 13:14 [PATCH v2 00/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe and allocation bugs Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix failed start cleanup Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Check runtime PM in IRQ Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Init hardware before registration Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix DMA registration unwind Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix LCLA allocation order Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe LCLA free Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe IRQ leak Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix memcpy channel parsing Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix logical channel bounds check Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:32   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix event group bounds Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Validate memcpy configuration Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] dmaengine: Use unique debugfs names Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260820133207.B33F31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox