DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/25] bpf/validate: break on error in evaluate
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 18:38:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506173846.64914-4-marat.khalili@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506173846.64914-1-marat.khalili@huawei.com>

Evaluation loop previously continued until the cycle end in case of an
evaluation error. It made reasoning about the code difficult since it
might be executing when the evaluation is already in an invalid state.

Change loop logic to break out of the loop immediately after an error.

Signed-off-by: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
---
 lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
index bf8a4abb5a5a..1619faf3604a 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
@@ -2401,11 +2401,11 @@ prune_eval_state(struct bpf_verifier *bvf, const struct inst_node *node,
 static int
 evaluate(struct bpf_verifier *bvf)
 {
-	int32_t rc;
 	uint32_t idx, op;
 	const char *err;
 	const struct ebpf_insn *ins;
 	struct inst_node *next, *node;
+	int rc = 0;
 
 	struct {
 		uint32_t nb_eval;
@@ -2439,11 +2439,10 @@ evaluate(struct bpf_verifier *bvf)
 	ins = bvf->prm->raw.ins;
 	node = bvf->in;
 	next = node;
-	rc = 0;
 
 	memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(stats));
 
-	while (node != NULL && rc == 0) {
+	while (node != NULL) {
 
 		/*
 		 * current node evaluation, make sure we evaluate
@@ -2457,17 +2456,20 @@ evaluate(struct bpf_verifier *bvf)
 
 			/* for jcc node make a copy of evaluation state */
 			if (node->nb_edge > 1) {
-				rc |= save_cur_eval_state(bvf, node);
+				rc = save_cur_eval_state(bvf, node);
+				if (rc < 0)
+					break;
 				stats.nb_save++;
 			}
 
-			if (ins_chk[op].eval != NULL && rc == 0) {
+			if (ins_chk[op].eval != NULL) {
 				err = ins_chk[op].eval(bvf, ins + idx);
 				stats.nb_eval++;
 				if (err != NULL) {
 					RTE_BPF_LOG_FUNC_LINE(ERR,
 						"%s at pc: %u", err, idx);
 					rc = -EINVAL;
+					break;
 				}
 			}
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-06 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-06 17:38 [PATCH 00/25] bpf: test and fix issues in verifier Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 01/25] bpf: format and dump jlt, jle, jslt, and jsle Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 02/25] bpf: add format instruction function Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` Marat Khalili [this message]
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 04/25] bpf/validate: expand comments in evaluate cycle Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 05/25] bpf/validate: introduce debugging interface Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 06/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_ADD of pointer to a scalar Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 07/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_LDX | EBPF_DW signed range Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 08/25] test/bpf_validate: add setup and basic tests Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 09/25] test/bpf_validate: add harness for pointer tests Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 10/25] bpf/validate: fix EBPF_JSLT | BPF_X evaluation Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 11/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_NEG of INT64_MIN and 0 Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 12/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_DIV and BPF_MOD signed part Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 13/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_MUL ranges minimum typo Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 14/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_MUL signed overflow UB Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 15/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_JGT/EBPF_JSGT no-jump max Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 16/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_JMP source range calculation Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 17/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_JMP empty range handling Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 18/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_AND min calculations Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 19/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_LSH shift-out-of-bounds UB Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 20/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_OR min calculations Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 21/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_SUB signed max zero case Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 22/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_XOR signed min calculation Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 23/25] bpf/validate: prevent overflow when building graph Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 24/25] doc: add release notes for BPF validation fixes Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 25/25] doc: add BPF validate debug to programmer's guide Marat Khalili
2026-05-08 17:41   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-09 12:36 ` [PATCH 00/25] bpf: test and fix issues in verifier Konstantin Ananyev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260506173846.64914-4-marat.khalili@huawei.com \
    --to=marat.khalili@huawei.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox