From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/25] bpf: test and fix issues in verifier
Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 12:36:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9ce38e21c254f4fbf75824586edcdbd@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506173846.64914-1-marat.khalili@huawei.com>
> This patchset addresses numerous bugs in the BPF verifier's abstract
> interpretation logic and introduces a new validation debugger API to
> enable precise, robust testing of the verifier itself.
>
> While the existing DPDK eBPF verifier is capable of checking basic
> execution graph loops and dead code, the mathematical tracking of
> register bounds (both signed and unsigned) contained flaws resulting in
> false positives and false negatives, undefined behavior, and hardware
> exceptions such as SIGFPE during validation.
>
> To resolve these issues and ensure they do not regress, this patchset
> first introduces the "Validation Debugger API"
> (`rte_bpf_validate_debug_*`). This gdb-like interface allows setting
> breakpoints and catchpoints during the validation process to inspect the
> verifier's internal state.
>
> Using this new API, a comprehensive test harness
> (`app/test/test_bpf_validate.c`) was created to formally check the
> abstract domains of instructions across all their valid branches. The
> remainder of the patchset incrementally fixes the math and bounds logic
> for individual eBPF instructions, using the new tests to prove the
> correctness of the fixes.
>
> This debugger API also lays the foundation for an interactive eBPF
> validation debugger to be introduced in the future.
>
> Depends-on: series-38068 ("bpf: introduce extensible load API")
>
> Marat Khalili (25):
> bpf: format and dump jlt, jle, jslt, and jsle
> bpf: add format instruction function
> bpf/validate: break on error in evaluate
> bpf/validate: expand comments in evaluate cycle
> bpf/validate: introduce debugging interface
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_ADD of pointer to a scalar
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_LDX | EBPF_DW signed range
> test/bpf_validate: add setup and basic tests
> test/bpf_validate: add harness for pointer tests
> bpf/validate: fix EBPF_JSLT | BPF_X evaluation
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_NEG of INT64_MIN and 0
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_DIV and BPF_MOD signed part
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_MUL ranges minimum typo
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_MUL signed overflow UB
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_JGT/EBPF_JSGT no-jump max
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_JMP source range calculation
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_JMP empty range handling
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_AND min calculations
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_LSH shift-out-of-bounds UB
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_OR min calculations
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_SUB signed max zero case
> bpf/validate: fix BPF_XOR signed min calculation
> bpf/validate: prevent overflow when building graph
> doc: add release notes for BPF validation fixes
> doc: add BPF validate debug to programmer's guide
>
> app/test/meson.build | 1 +
> app/test/test_bpf.c | 99 ++
> app/test/test_bpf_validate.c | 2271 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> doc/guides/prog_guide/bpf_lib.rst | 31 +
> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_26_07.rst | 16 +
> lib/bpf/bpf_dump.c | 292 +--
> lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c | 730 +++++++-
> lib/bpf/bpf_validate.h | 54 +
> lib/bpf/bpf_validate_debug.c | 663 +++++++
> lib/bpf/bpf_validate_debug.h | 86 +
> lib/bpf/bpf_value_set.c | 403 +++++
> lib/bpf/bpf_value_set.h | 126 ++
> lib/bpf/meson.build | 9 +-
> lib/bpf/rte_bpf.h | 55 +
> lib/bpf/rte_bpf_validate_debug.h | 377 ++++
> 15 files changed, 5016 insertions(+), 197 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 app/test/test_bpf_validate.c
> create mode 100644 lib/bpf/bpf_validate.h
> create mode 100644 lib/bpf/bpf_validate_debug.c
> create mode 100644 lib/bpf/bpf_validate_debug.h
> create mode 100644 lib/bpf/bpf_value_set.c
> create mode 100644 lib/bpf/bpf_value_set.h
> create mode 100644 lib/bpf/rte_bpf_validate_debug.h
>
> --
I already reviewed these changes offline, as part of our
internal patch acceptance process.
Current version LGMT and addresses all comments I had.
Series-Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
> 2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-09 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 17:38 [PATCH 00/25] bpf: test and fix issues in verifier Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 01/25] bpf: format and dump jlt, jle, jslt, and jsle Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 02/25] bpf: add format instruction function Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 03/25] bpf/validate: break on error in evaluate Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 04/25] bpf/validate: expand comments in evaluate cycle Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 05/25] bpf/validate: introduce debugging interface Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 06/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_ADD of pointer to a scalar Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 07/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_LDX | EBPF_DW signed range Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 08/25] test/bpf_validate: add setup and basic tests Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 09/25] test/bpf_validate: add harness for pointer tests Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 10/25] bpf/validate: fix EBPF_JSLT | BPF_X evaluation Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 11/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_NEG of INT64_MIN and 0 Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 12/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_DIV and BPF_MOD signed part Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 13/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_MUL ranges minimum typo Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 14/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_MUL signed overflow UB Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 15/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_JGT/EBPF_JSGT no-jump max Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 16/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_JMP source range calculation Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 17/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_JMP empty range handling Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 18/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_AND min calculations Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 19/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_LSH shift-out-of-bounds UB Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 20/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_OR min calculations Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 21/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_SUB signed max zero case Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 22/25] bpf/validate: fix BPF_XOR signed min calculation Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 23/25] bpf/validate: prevent overflow when building graph Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 24/25] doc: add release notes for BPF validation fixes Marat Khalili
2026-05-06 17:38 ` [PATCH 25/25] doc: add BPF validate debug to programmer's guide Marat Khalili
2026-05-08 17:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-09 12:36 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9ce38e21c254f4fbf75824586edcdbd@huawei.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=marat.khalili@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox