DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, <sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com>,
	<dev@dpdk.org>,  <thomas@monjalon.net>, <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
	<yangxingui@huawei.com>,  <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 17:54:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d303b47-aae9-4e0c-ba6c-e1d5ab607f74@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526121813.0e15163e@phoenix.local>


On 5/27/2026 3:18 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2026 21:09:47 +0800
> "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for giving me this AI review feedback.
>> Some of them are still acceptable. will fix it in next version.
>>
>> Is this summary from AI generated for each patche series?
>> May ask where you obtained this information about AI review?
> There is automated review from CI which is done after CI tests runs pass.
> But it is using older version of AGENTS.md and missing tool skills support.
> I use Claude AI project with current version of AGENTS.md.
> It gives the best reviews since it is willing to go look at the existing code.
> Other methods just look at the patch itself.
Got it. Thanks for your AI review.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-27  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-16  3:05 [PATCH v1 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v1 01/15] power/kvm_vm: enforce enabled lcore ID check Huisong Li
2026-04-16 15:48   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-17  2:51     ` lihuisong (C)
2026-04-21 11:07       ` lihuisong (C)
2026-04-21 14:23       ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-22  9:18         ` lihuisong (C)
2026-04-16  3:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] power: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 07/15] power: add a common macro to verify lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] power/pmd_mgmt: replace lcore ID verification with new macro Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] power/qos: replace the " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] power/cpufreq: add the lcore ID verification to framework Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] power/kvm_vm: " Huisong Li
2026-04-16 15:51 ` [PATCH v1 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-17  2:53   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-05-07  2:42 ` [PATCH V2 " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 01/15] eal: add interface to check if lcore is EAL managed Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 02/15] power/kvm_vm: validate lcore role in cpufreq API Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 03/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 04/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 05/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 06/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 07/15] power: add a common macro to verify lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 08/15] power/cpufreq: add the lcore ID verification to framework Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 09/15] power/acpi_cpufreq: remove the verification of lcore ID Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 10/15] power/amd_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 11/15] power/cppc_cpufreq: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 12/15] power/intel_pstate: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 13/15] power/kvm_vm: " Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 14/15] power: allow the service core to config power QoS Huisong Li
2026-05-07  2:42   ` [PATCH V2 15/15] power: add lcore ID check for PMD mgmt Huisong Li
2026-05-18  7:02   ` [PATCH V2 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification lihuisong (C)
2026-05-18 17:59   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-19 13:09     ` lihuisong (C)
2026-05-26 19:18       ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-27  9:54         ` lihuisong (C) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d303b47-aae9-4e0c-ba6c-e1d5ab607f74@huawei.com \
    --to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox