From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] Another drbd race
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:20:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040908112001.GD20844@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409071447.45785.philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
On 2004-09-07T14:47:45,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> said:
> No. It would be better to have a "drbdadm fence r0" operation on N2!
> The "drbdadm fence r0" command would only set the "Outdated" flag.
Well, it's automatically supposed to assume it's outdated when it
crashes in S-P mode.
When the secondary loses connection to the primary, a mark-peer-dead
would prevent that flag from being set.
So, why an explicit drbdadm fence operation? I'm missing what that would
catch.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering \\\ ///
SUSE Labs, Research and Development \honk/
SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company \\//
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-08 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040819110202.GO9601@marowsky-bree.de>
[not found] ` <20040819113205.GP9601@marowsky-bree.de>
[not found] ` <R+ahoCHARbsLOMKIahWH0/Q=lge@web.de>
2004-08-20 12:52 ` [Drbd-dev] Re: drbd Frage zu secondary vs primary; drbddisk status problem Philipp Reisner
2004-08-20 13:32 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-08-23 14:28 ` [Drbd-dev] gen_counts and primary --human Lars Ellenberg
2004-08-23 21:57 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-08-25 9:42 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-08-23 21:56 ` [Drbd-dev] Re: drbd Frage zu secondary vs primary; drbddisk status problem Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-08-25 9:42 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-08-25 10:28 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-08-25 11:30 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-08-25 13:38 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-04 9:48 ` [Drbd-dev] Another drbd race Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-04 10:00 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-04 10:18 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-04 10:43 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-04 10:51 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-07 9:39 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-07 10:13 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-07 11:32 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-07 12:05 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-07 12:12 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-07 12:06 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-07 12:19 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-07 12:28 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-07 12:47 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-08 11:20 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2004-09-08 11:31 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-08 15:11 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-08 15:22 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-08 11:33 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-07 15:55 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-08-20 14:10 ` [Drbd-dev] Re: drbd Frage zu secondary vs primary; drbddisk status problem Helmut Wollmersdorfer
2004-08-23 22:01 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040908112001.GD20844@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox