From: Helmut Wollmersdorfer <helmut@wollmersdorfer.at>
To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] Re: drbd Frage zu secondary vs primary; drbddisk status problem
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:10:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41260639.7030806@wollmersdorfer.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408201452.52512.philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Philipp Reisner wrote:
[...]
> Which policies do we want to offer ?
>
> * The node that was primary before split brain (current behaviour)
> * The node that becaume primary during split brain
> * The node that modified more of it's data during the split-brain
> situation [ Do not think about implementation yet, just about
> the policy ]
> * others ?...
* The node preferred by the user,
if both nodes can be Primary.
This makes sense, when the standby node provides not
the same performance.
* The more stable node - "stable" TBD [To Be Defined]
Helmut Wollmersdorfer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-20 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040819110202.GO9601@marowsky-bree.de>
[not found] ` <20040819113205.GP9601@marowsky-bree.de>
[not found] ` <R+ahoCHARbsLOMKIahWH0/Q=lge@web.de>
2004-08-20 12:52 ` [Drbd-dev] Re: drbd Frage zu secondary vs primary; drbddisk status problem Philipp Reisner
2004-08-20 13:32 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-08-23 14:28 ` [Drbd-dev] gen_counts and primary --human Lars Ellenberg
2004-08-23 21:57 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-08-25 9:42 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-08-23 21:56 ` [Drbd-dev] Re: drbd Frage zu secondary vs primary; drbddisk status problem Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-08-25 9:42 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-08-25 10:28 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-08-25 11:30 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-08-25 13:38 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-04 9:48 ` [Drbd-dev] Another drbd race Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-04 10:00 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-04 10:18 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-04 10:43 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-04 10:51 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-07 9:39 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-07 10:13 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-07 11:32 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-07 12:05 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-07 12:12 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-07 12:06 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-07 12:19 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-07 12:28 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-07 12:47 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-08 11:20 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-08 11:31 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-08 15:11 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-08 15:22 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-09-08 11:33 ` Philipp Reisner
2004-09-07 15:55 ` Lars Ellenberg
2004-08-20 14:10 ` Helmut Wollmersdorfer [this message]
2004-08-23 22:01 ` [Drbd-dev] Re: drbd Frage zu secondary vs primary; drbddisk status problem Lars Marowsky-Bree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41260639.7030806@wollmersdorfer.at \
--to=helmut@wollmersdorfer.at \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox