FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] xfs/2301: test lazy bounce buffering mode
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:42:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929014204.GI2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924100855.2734089-7-hch@lst.de>

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:07:47PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Run fsx (based on generic/091) while injecting lazy bounce buffer
> retries for reads.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/2301     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/2301.out | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/2301
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/2301.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/2301 b/tests/xfs/2301
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..605510c6dbc8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/2301
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2000-2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
> +# Copyright (c) 2026 Christoph Hellwig.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 2301
> +#
> +# Run fsx with error injection for re-retries with bounce buffers, simulating

Aren't these just retries?

> +# users modifying the in-flight data buffer.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest rw auto quick datacsum
> +
> +. ./common/filter
> +. ./common/inject
> +
> +_require_test
> +_require_odirect
> +_require_xfs_data_csum $TEST_DIR
> +
> +psize=`$here/src/feature -s`
> +bsize=`$here/src/min_dio_alignment $TEST_DIR $TEST_DEV`
> +
> +_test_inject_error bounce_reread 100

Were it not for this I'd say this should be a generic test.  But I guess
generic/091 tests the no-bounce code paths just fine, right?

> +# fsx load similar to generic/091
> +echo "Testing direct I/O"
> +run_fsx -N 10000            -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +run_fsx -N 10000  -o 8192   -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +run_fsx -N 10000  -o 32768  -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +run_fsx -N 10000  -o 8192   -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +run_fsx -N 10000  -o 32768  -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +run_fsx -N 10000  -o 128000 -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -W
> +
> +# fsx load similar to generic/091 but using buffered I/O
> +echo "Testing buffered I/O"
> +run_fsx -N 10000            -l 500000
> +run_fsx -N 10000  -o 8192   -l 500000
> +run_fsx -N 10000  -o 32768  -l 500000
> +run_fsx -N 10000  -o 128000 -l 500000
> +
> +status=0
> +exit

_exit 0

--D

> diff --git a/tests/xfs/2301.out b/tests/xfs/2301.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..221a3185970c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/2301.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +QA output created by 2301
> +Testing direct I/O
> +fsx -N 10000 -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +fsx -N 10000 -o 8192 -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +fsx -N 10000 -o 32768 -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +fsx -N 10000 -o 8192 -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +fsx -N 10000 -o 32768 -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -R -W
> +fsx -N 10000 -o 128000 -l 500000 -r BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z -W
> +Testing buffered I/O
> +fsx -N 10000 -l 500000
> +fsx -N 10000 -o 8192 -l 500000
> +fsx -N 10000 -o 32768 -l 500000
> +fsx -N 10000 -o 128000 -l 500000
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 10:07 xfstests support for RT data checksums Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 01/13] add a "datacsum" group Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/13] common: add a SCRATCH_MKFS_OPTIONS variable Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: add a XFS_VERIFY_FILE_DATA variable Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs/206: filter out csum information from mkfs output Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add a _require_xfs_data_csum helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:38   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 14:48       ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 14:55         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs/2301: test lazy bounce buffering mode Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:42   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-10-05 13:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs/2302: add a basic data checksum test Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs/2303: test that data checksums detect data misplacement Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs/2304: version of generic/388 that run xfs_scrub -x for each iteration Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 14:51       ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 14:56         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 15:20           ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-07 13:42             ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:19               ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs/2305: version of generic/475 " Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs/2306: test mkfs input validation for RT data csum options Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs/2307: test checksum handling using corrupted checksums Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  2:05   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs/2308: test rebuilding of csum files in xfs_repair Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  2:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:27     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260929014204.GI2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox