From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] xfs/2304: version of generic/388 that run xfs_scrub -x for each iteration
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:56:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929015645.GL2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924100855.2734089-10-hch@lst.de>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:07:50PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> To check both the metadata integrity and file system checksums after
> log replay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> tests/xfs/2304 | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/2304.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/2304
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/2304.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/2304 b/tests/xfs/2304
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..ad4f45d79057
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/2304
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2016 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 2304
> +#
> +# Copied from generic/388, with added xfs_scrub -x calls for each iteration to
> +# verify the integrity of all file data and metadata.
> +#
> +# Test XFS log recovery ordering on v5 superblock filesystems. XFS had a problem
> +# where it would incorrectly replay older modifications from the log over more
> +# recent versions of metadata due to failure to update metadata LSNs during log
> +# recovery. This could result in false positive reports of corruption during log
> +# recovery and permanent mount failure.
> +#
> +# To test this situation, run frequent shutdowns immediately after log recovery.
> +# Ensure that log recovery does not recover stale modifications and cause
> +# spurious corruption reports and/or mount failures.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest shutdown auto log metadata recoveryloop datacsum
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_local_device $SCRATCH_DEV
> +_require_scratch_shutdown
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden."
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
> +_scratch_mount
> +_require_scratch_xfs_scrub
> +
> +while _soak_loop_running $((50 * TIME_FACTOR)); do
> + _run_fsstress_bg -d $SCRATCH_MNT -n 999999 -p 4
> +
> + # purposely include 0 second sleeps to test shutdown immediately after
> + # recovery
> + sleep $((RANDOM % 3))
> + _scratch_shutdown
> +
> + _kill_fsstress
> +
> + # Toggle between rw and ro mounts for recovery. Quit if any mount
> + # attempt fails so we don't shutdown the host fs.
> + if [ $((RANDOM % 2)) -eq 0 ]; then
> + _scratch_cycle_mount || _fail "cycle mount failed"
> + else
> + _scratch_cycle_mount "ro" || _fail "cycle ro mount failed"
> + _scratch_cycle_mount || _fail "cycle rw mount failed"
> + fi
> +
> + $XFS_SCRUB_PROG -x $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1
I think we should just change generic/388 to run xfs_scrub after
recovery, and add -x if data checksums are enabled? That /would/ have
the effect of catching recovery errors (or scrub bugs) earlier.
Though I wonder how much that reduces the number of loop iterations over
a given SOAK_DURATION?
--D
> + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> + _fail "scrub found errors"
> + fi
> +done
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/2304.out b/tests/xfs/2304.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..07ee489db9fa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/2304.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 2304
> +Silence is golden.
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 10:07 xfstests support for RT data checksums Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 01/13] add a "datacsum" group Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/13] common: add a SCRATCH_MKFS_OPTIONS variable Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: add a XFS_VERIFY_FILE_DATA variable Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs/206: filter out csum information from mkfs output Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add a _require_xfs_data_csum helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 14:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs/2301: test lazy bounce buffering mode Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs/2302: add a basic data checksum test Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs/2303: test that data checksums detect data misplacement Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs/2304: version of generic/388 that run xfs_scrub -x for each iteration Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:56 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-10-05 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 14:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 15:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-07 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs/2305: version of generic/475 " Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs/2306: test mkfs input validation for RT data csum options Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs/2307: test checksum handling using corrupted checksums Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 2:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs/2308: test rebuilding of csum files in xfs_repair Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 2:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929015645.GL2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox