FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] xfs/2304: version of generic/388 that run xfs_scrub -x for each iteration
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 08:20:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261005152057.GC2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005145615.GB2082@lst.de>

On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 07:51:23AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > I'm ok with g388 running more slowly if it'll catch data checksum bugs
> > and whatnot.  I'm a little surprised that it doesn't already run
> > _check_filesystems every loop iteration.
> 
> Maybe we should patch that in first, and then XFS_VERIFY_FILE_DATA
> magically does the right thing?

I was about to repy "Sounds like a good idea for g388 and probably g475
as well" but then I remembered something from my notes.  The two tests
run without _check_filesystems on the assumption that accidental
corruptions will multiply until either (a) the cycle_mount will fail or
(b) the post-test _check_filesystems will have a lot to complain about.
Doing the check every loop cycle reduces the number of log recoveries
that we can do in a given SOAK_DURATION by a significant amount.

What if we ran $XFS_IO_PROG -c verifymedia once per loop if
XFS_VERIFY_FILE_DATA?  That would avoid a full xfs_{repair,scrub} run
(+ extra mount cycle) but catch problems earlier.

--D

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 10:07 xfstests support for RT data checksums Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 01/13] add a "datacsum" group Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/13] common: add a SCRATCH_MKFS_OPTIONS variable Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: add a XFS_VERIFY_FILE_DATA variable Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs/206: filter out csum information from mkfs output Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add a _require_xfs_data_csum helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:38   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 14:48       ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 14:55         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs/2301: test lazy bounce buffering mode Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs/2302: add a basic data checksum test Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs/2303: test that data checksums detect data misplacement Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs/2304: version of generic/388 that run xfs_scrub -x for each iteration Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 14:51       ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 14:56         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 15:20           ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-10-07 13:42             ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:19               ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs/2305: version of generic/475 " Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs/2306: test mkfs input validation for RT data csum options Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  1:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs/2307: test checksum handling using corrupted checksums Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  2:05   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs/2308: test rebuilding of csum files in xfs_repair Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29  2:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:27     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261005152057.GC2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox