Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
	"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] hash: use git_hash_init() consistently
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 16:13:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707201315.GC11780@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq5x2q984j.fsf@gitster.g>

On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 07:39:24AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > diff --git a/object-file.c b/object-file.c
> > index e3c68cfb66..f292683c2d 100644
> > --- a/object-file.c
> > +++ b/object-file.c
> > ...
> > -	algo->init_fn(c);
> > -	if (compat && compat_c)
> > -		compat->init_fn(compat_c);
> > +	git_hash_init(c, algo);
> > +	if (compat && compat_c) {
> > +		git_hash_init(compat_c, compat);
> > +	}
> 
> For example, it is a mystery how Coccinelle decided to add a pair of
> braces around this single statement.  It should be obvious that the
> corresponding single statement in the original did not need one.

Yeah, I noticed that coccinelle was eager to add braces in a few cases,
but I'm not sure why.

I had actually removed them, but either I missed these two, or more
likely I ended up re-applying the semantic patch a final time before
committing (I did a lot of "reset --hard; make hash.cocci.patch && git
apply hash.cocci.patch" while testing various refactors of the patch
itself).

I'll drop them in v2. Thanks for reading carefully.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07  4:55 [PATCH 0/7] git_hash_*() quality-of-life improvements Jeff King
2026-07-07  5:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] hash: use git_hash_init() consistently Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:13     ` Jeff King [this message]
2026-07-07 20:17       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:25         ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 21:25   ` brian m. carlson
2026-07-08  3:54     ` Jeff King
2026-07-07  5:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] hash: convert remaining direct function calls Jeff King
2026-07-07 16:15   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07  5:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] hash: document function pointers and wrappers Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:26   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-07 20:05     ` Jeff King
2026-07-07  5:07 ` [PATCH 4/7] hash: make git_hash_discard() idempotent Jeff King
2026-07-07 16:22   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:18     ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 21:41       ` brian m. carlson
2026-07-07 22:25         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07  5:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] csum-file: use idempotent git_hash_discard() Jeff King
2026-07-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 6/7] http: " Jeff King
2026-07-07 16:25   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07  5:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] hash: check ctx->active flag in all wrapper functions Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:26   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-07 16:33   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:10     ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:26 ` [PATCH 0/7] git_hash_*() quality-of-life improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-08  3:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff King
2026-07-08  3:52   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] hash: use git_hash_init() consistently Jeff King
2026-07-08  3:52   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] hash: convert remaining direct function calls Jeff King
2026-07-08  3:52   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] hash: document function pointers and wrappers Jeff King
2026-07-08  3:52   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] hash: make git_hash_discard() idempotent Jeff King
2026-07-08  3:53   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] csum-file: use idempotent git_hash_discard() Jeff King
2026-07-08  3:53   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] http: " Jeff King
2026-07-08  3:53   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] hash: check ctx->active flag in all wrapper functions Jeff King
2026-07-08  8:05   ` [PATCH v2 0/7] git_hash_*() quality-of-life improvements Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260707201315.GC11780@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox