From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] hash: use git_hash_init() consistently
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 23:54:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708035439.GA41684@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ak1u25b2pmRAQIxD@fruit.crustytoothpaste.net>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 09:25:48PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On 2026-07-07 at 05:01:41, Jeff King wrote:
> > We'd like to add more logic to git_hash_init(), but many callers skip it
> > and call algop->init_fn() directly. Let's make sure we're consistently
> > using the wrapper by adding a coccinelle rule.
> >
> > Besides the coccinelle file itself, this is a purely mechanical
> > conversion based on the patch it generates. There should be no bare
> > init_fn() calls left (except for the one in the wrapper).
>
> For context, the reason `git_hash_init` exists is that our Rust code
> needs to initialize a hash context but it treats `const struct
> git_hash_algo *` as `const void *` and doesn't have any access to the
> contents of the structure. We could fix this with `cbindgen` and
> `bindgen`, but haven't done so yet.
>
> So that's why everybody has been using `init_fn` instead of
> `git_hash_init`. Anyway, I have no objections to making this the
> standard interface going forward.
Thanks, I remember there being some actual reason but couldn't recall
exactly what it was. The use of bare algo->update_fn(), etc, in two
spots was what really puzzled me. It's not wrong, but just harder to
write than the usual way. ;)
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 4:55 [PATCH 0/7] git_hash_*() quality-of-life improvements Jeff King
2026-07-07 5:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] hash: use git_hash_init() consistently Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:13 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 20:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:25 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 21:25 ` brian m. carlson
2026-07-08 3:54 ` Jeff King [this message]
2026-07-07 5:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] hash: convert remaining direct function calls Jeff King
2026-07-07 16:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 5:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] hash: document function pointers and wrappers Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-07 20:05 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 5:07 ` [PATCH 4/7] hash: make git_hash_discard() idempotent Jeff King
2026-07-07 16:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:18 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 21:41 ` brian m. carlson
2026-07-07 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 5:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] csum-file: use idempotent git_hash_discard() Jeff King
2026-07-07 5:08 ` [PATCH 6/7] http: " Jeff King
2026-07-07 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 5:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] hash: check ctx->active flag in all wrapper functions Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-07 16:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:10 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:26 ` [PATCH 0/7] git_hash_*() quality-of-life improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] hash: use git_hash_init() consistently Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] hash: convert remaining direct function calls Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] hash: document function pointers and wrappers Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] hash: make git_hash_discard() idempotent Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] csum-file: use idempotent git_hash_discard() Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:53 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] http: " Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:53 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] hash: check ctx->active flag in all wrapper functions Jeff King
2026-07-08 8:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] git_hash_*() quality-of-life improvements Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708035439.GA41684@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox