From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] hash: check ctx->active flag in all wrapper functions
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 16:26:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak0MoazdNNj1_7OQ@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707050952.GG1288294@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 01:09:52AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> It only makes sense to call git_hash_update(), etc, on a hash context
> that has been initialized but not yet finalized or discarded. This is an
> unlikely error to make, but it's easy for us to catch it and complain.
>
> It's especially important because it would quietly "work" for many hash
> backends (like sha1dc, which is just manipulating some bytes) but would
> cause undefined behavior with others (like OpenSSL, which puts the
> context onto the heap). Checking the flag lets us catch problems
> consistently on every build.
>
> Note that we can't do the same for git_init_hash(). Even though it would
You probably mean `git_hash_init()`?
> cause a leak to call it twice (without an intervening final/discard),
> the point of the function is that the contents of the struct are
> undefined before the call. But calling it twice is an even less likely
> error to make, so not covering it is OK.
Right. We could of course enforce that the structure must be zeroed
before calling this function. But I agree that this would become quite
awkward.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 4:55 [PATCH 0/7] git_hash_*() quality-of-life improvements Jeff King
2026-07-07 5:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] hash: use git_hash_init() consistently Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:13 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 20:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:25 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 21:25 ` brian m. carlson
2026-07-08 3:54 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 5:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] hash: convert remaining direct function calls Jeff King
2026-07-07 16:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 5:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] hash: document function pointers and wrappers Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-07 20:05 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 5:07 ` [PATCH 4/7] hash: make git_hash_discard() idempotent Jeff King
2026-07-07 16:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:18 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 21:41 ` brian m. carlson
2026-07-07 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 5:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] csum-file: use idempotent git_hash_discard() Jeff King
2026-07-07 5:08 ` [PATCH 6/7] http: " Jeff King
2026-07-07 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 5:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] hash: check ctx->active flag in all wrapper functions Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-07-07 16:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-07 20:10 ` Jeff King
2026-07-07 14:26 ` [PATCH 0/7] git_hash_*() quality-of-life improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] hash: use git_hash_init() consistently Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] hash: convert remaining direct function calls Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] hash: document function pointers and wrappers Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] hash: make git_hash_discard() idempotent Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] csum-file: use idempotent git_hash_discard() Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:53 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] http: " Jeff King
2026-07-08 3:53 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] hash: check ctx->active flag in all wrapper functions Jeff King
2026-07-08 8:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] git_hash_*() quality-of-life improvements Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak0MoazdNNj1_7OQ@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox