From: Taylor Blau <ttaylorr@openai.com>
To: Ted Nyman <tnyman@openai.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
"Karthik Nayak" <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] http: use unique tempfiles for packfile URI downloads
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 21:06:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alW1tAnMtOznxrhK@com-79390> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alVn-QmK3K91_tkH@com-76773>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 03:34:33PM -0700, Ted Nyman wrote:
> Since 8d5d2a34df (http-fetch: support fetching packfiles by URL,
> 2020-06-10), packfile URI downloads have been staged at
> objects/pack/pack-<hash>.pack.temp.
>
> The path is derived from the advertised pack hash. Two processes
> fetching the same pack into a shared object database therefore open the
> same file for append. Their writes can corrupt the temporary pack. If
> one process arrives after the other has completed the download, it may
> instead try to resume at EOF, which some HTTP servers reject with 416.
>
> Use the tempfile API to give direct packfile URI downloads unique
> temporary files. Keep the deterministic path for ordinary dumb HTTP
> pack requests, which use it to resume a partial download left by an
> earlier invocation.
>
> This means that a packfile URI download cannot be resumed by a later
> invocation. A retry starts with an empty temporary file instead.
>
> Add a test which pauses one process after downloading the pack and
> starts another process using the same object database.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ted Nyman <tnyman@openai.com>
> ---
> Documentation/git-http-fetch.adoc | 5 +-
> http.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> http.h | 1 +
> t/t5550-http-fetch-dumb.sh | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-http-fetch.adoc b/Documentation/git-http-fetch.adoc
> index 2200f073c4..533bf381c4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-http-fetch.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/git-http-fetch.adoc
> @@ -48,9 +48,8 @@ commit-id::
> line (which is not expected in
> this case), 'git http-fetch' fetches the packfile directly at the given
> URL and uses index-pack to generate corresponding .idx and .keep files.
> - The hash is used to determine the name of the temporary file and is
> - arbitrary. The output of index-pack is printed to stdout. Requires
> - --index-pack-args.
> + The hash is arbitrary. The output of index-pack is printed to stdout.
> + Requires --index-pack-args.
>
> --index-pack-args=<args>::
> For internal use only. The command to run on the contents of the
> diff --git a/http.c b/http.c
> index b4e7b8d00b..5a46e7c65c 100644
> --- a/http.c
> +++ b/http.c
> @@ -2668,7 +2668,10 @@ int http_get_info_packs(const char *base_url, struct packfile_list *packs)
>
> void release_http_pack_request(struct http_pack_request *preq)
> {
> - if (preq->packfile) {
> + if (preq->tempfile) {
> + delete_tempfile(&preq->tempfile);
> + preq->packfile = NULL;
We should be able to drop the assignment to NULL on the second line,
since `delete_tempfile()` takes a double pointer to the 'struct
packfile' and NULL's it out for us.
(The other callers appear to avoid explicitly setting `preq->tempfile`
to NULL.)
The rest of the patch looks good to me.
> diff --git a/http.h b/http.h
> index 729c51904d..2c900779f5 100644
> --- a/http.h
> +++ b/http.h
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ struct http_pack_request {
>
> FILE *packfile;
> struct strbuf tmpfile;
> + struct tempfile *tempfile;
> struct active_request_slot *slot;
> struct curl_slist *headers;
> };
> diff --git a/t/t5550-http-fetch-dumb.sh b/t/t5550-http-fetch-dumb.sh
> index b0080bf204..314a74c433 100755
> --- a/t/t5550-http-fetch-dumb.sh
> +++ b/t/t5550-http-fetch-dumb.sh
> @@ -293,6 +293,74 @@ test_expect_success 'http-fetch --packfile' '
> git -C packfileclient cat-file -e "$HASH"
> '
>
> +test_expect_success PIPE 'concurrent http-fetch --packfile' '
Phew ;-).
This is definitely tricky to test, but what you wrote here looks
plausibly correct to me.
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 22:37 [PATCH 0/2] packfile URIs: support concurrent downloads Ted Nyman
2026-07-13 22:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] http: use unique tempfiles for packfile URI downloads Ted Nyman
2026-07-14 1:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-14 1:58 ` Ted Nyman
2026-07-14 4:07 ` Taylor Blau
2026-07-14 5:28 ` Jeff King
2026-07-14 4:06 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2026-07-14 5:44 ` Jeff King
2026-07-14 6:46 ` Jeff King
2026-07-13 22:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] fetch-pack: accept "pack" output for packfile URIs Ted Nyman
2026-07-14 7:12 ` Jeff King
2026-07-14 7:13 ` Jeff King
2026-07-14 4:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] packfile URIs: support concurrent downloads Taylor Blau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alW1tAnMtOznxrhK@com-79390 \
--to=ttaylorr@openai.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=tnyman@openai.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox