From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ident: remove unused author_ident_sufficiently_given()
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 07:41:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aurTjEgKc5yw_vwD@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtslx7nam.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 11:00:33AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 10:39:53AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> A pair of functions {author,committer}_ident_sufficiently_given()
> >> were created to replace user_ident_explicitly_given() in d6991ceedc
> >
> > Nit, not worth a reroll, but isn't it "was created" as it is a singular
> > pair? Might just be me not being a native speaker though.
>
> Neither am I a native speaker, but "Syntactic vs Notional Agreement"
> is what makes both valid.
>
> Treating the "pair" as a singular subject is the strictly formal
> choice preferred by most academic and traditional style guides.
>
> Even though "pair" is grammatically singular, it represents two
> distinct things, and in this particular case, we are retiring one of
> them while keeping the other, treating the "pair" as a separable
> two.
Thanks, today I learned :)
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 17:39 [PATCH 0/4] mark symbols that are unnecessarily public static Junio C Hamano
2026-10-30 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] ident: remove unused author_ident_sufficiently_given() Junio C Hamano
2026-10-30 18:22 ` Jeff King
2026-11-03 10:23 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-11-03 19:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-11-04 6:41 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-10-30 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] add -i: hide init/clear_add_i_state() functions Junio C Hamano
2026-11-03 10:23 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-11-03 19:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-30 17:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] read-cache: hide refresh_cache_entry() Junio C Hamano
2026-10-30 18:25 ` Jeff King
2026-10-30 17:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] unpack-trees: hide verify_uptodate() Junio C Hamano
2026-10-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] mark symbols that are unnecessarily public static Jeff King
2026-11-03 10:23 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aurTjEgKc5yw_vwD@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox