Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Vsevolod Myalitsin <ub4nal@mail.ru>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org, ben.knoble@gmail.org,  gitster@pobox.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] advice: introduce advice scoping mechanism
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:54:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh5jwevbm.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910190345.GA903701@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 10 Sep 2026 15:03:45 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> I kind of wonder if _all_ advice should just say "--global". I cannot
> think of an advice flag that is really repo specific. They are about
> silencing extra help because the _user_ understands the situation and
> wants Git to be less chatty.

I think there are two things in play.

 * If applicability of a piece of advice depends on the workflow
   employed, and a user who works on multiple projects that use
   different workflows, set of advice messages may want to be
   squelched per project, hence "--global" may not be appropriate.

 * "I, a physical single person, understand this piece of advice" is
   inherently per user, so squelching a piece of advice that the
   physical single person understands globally may make sense very
   well.

In hindsight, the latter argument should have been given more
weight, but I think the primary thinking back when we designed the
customizable advice messages was instead the former.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2027-08-29  0:49 [PATCH v3] advice: use global config for default branch name Vsevolod Myalitsin
2026-09-09 20:27 ` Jeff King
2026-09-09 21:21   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-09 21:22   ` Vsevolod Myalitsin
2026-09-09 22:46     ` Jeff King
2026-09-10  4:43       ` Vsevolod Myalitsin
2026-09-09 20:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-09 21:30   ` Vsevolod Myalitsin
2026-09-09 22:31     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-10  8:53 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] defaultBranchName advice is useless Vsevolod Myalitsin
2026-09-10  8:53   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] advice: pass the entire advice_setting to vadvise() Vsevolod Myalitsin
2026-09-10 17:43     ` SZEDER Gábor
2026-09-10  8:53   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] advice: introduce advice scoping mechanism Vsevolod Myalitsin
2026-09-10 15:36     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-10 15:52       ` Jeff King
2026-09-10 17:54         ` Vsevolod Myalitsin
2026-09-10 19:05           ` Jeff King
2026-09-10 18:35         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-10 19:03           ` Jeff King
2026-09-10 19:54             ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-09-10 20:11               ` Jeff King
2026-09-10 20:25                 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-12  8:12                   ` Vsevolod Myalitsin
2026-09-13 16:32                     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-10  8:53   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] advice: use global config for default branch name Vsevolod Myalitsin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh5jwevbm.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=ben.knoble@gmail.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.me \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=ub4nal@mail.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox