From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: pnv has a backlight polarity control bit, too
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:27:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335176904_26802@CP5-2952> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335173535-14811-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:15 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> So let's use it.
>
> We already correctly ignore bit0 on gen < 4, now we also now why ;-)
> I've decided that losing that single bit of precision isn't worth the
> trouble to sprinkle IS_PINEVIEW checks all over the backlight control
> code - that code is way too fragile imo.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 67c4ca0..45d5568 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1805,6 +1805,8 @@
> */
> #define BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_SHIFT (0)
> #define BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK (0xffff)
> +#define BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK_PNV (0xfffe)
> +#define BLM_POLARITY_PNV (1 << 0) /* pnv only */
>
> #define BLC_HIST_CTL 0x61260
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> index 1874517..e519221 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> @@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ static u32 intel_panel_compute_brightness(struct drm_device *dev, u32 val)
> dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_INVERT_BRIGHTNESS)
> return intel_panel_get_max_backlight(dev) - val;
>
> - /* gen4 has a polarity bit */
> - if (IS_GEN4(dev) && (I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL2) & BLM_POLARITY_I965))
> + /* gen4/pnv has a polarity bit */
> + if (IS_GEN4(dev) && (I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL2) & BLM_POLARITY_I965) ||
> + IS_PINEVIEW(dev) && (I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL) & BLM_POLARITY_PNV))
Now that is just getting ugly. Break this out into a simple and readable
predicate function intel_panel_backlight_is_inverted().
> return intel_panel_get_max_backlight(dev) - val;
Tabtastic.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-23 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 9:32 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: clear up backlight inversion confusion on gen4 Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 9:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: pnv has a backlight polarity control bit, too Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 10:27 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2012-04-23 9:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: clear up backlight inversion confusion on gen4 Chris Wilson
2012-04-23 12:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 12:32 ` Chris Wilson
2012-04-23 13:48 ` Daniel Vetter
[not found] ` <4F9542EF.3010208@osadl.org>
2012-04-23 12:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 13:15 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-23 13:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 14:00 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-23 14:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 15:06 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-23 15:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 15:38 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-23 15:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 16:55 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: " Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: " Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: completely revert the invert brightness quirk Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: add quirk to indicate that an alt bit is used for brightness inversion Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 17:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-26 17:25 ` [PATCH] properly enable the blc controller on the right pipe Daniel Vetter
2012-04-26 17:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-26 19:12 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 19:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-27 20:18 ` Carsten Emde
2012-06-02 23:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-11 8:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-19 14:00 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-19 14:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-19 22:51 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-20 8:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-24 7:30 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-25 22:35 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-26 11:55 ` [PATCH] drm/i915 disable combination mode Daniel Vetter
2012-07-26 12:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-26 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-26 14:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: assign the brightness inversion quirk to Acer Aspire 5734Z Carsten Emde
2012-04-27 16:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: Re: clear up backlight inversion confusion on gen4 Monark Gondaliya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1335176904_26802@CP5-2952 \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox