From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: clear up backlight inversion confusion on gen4
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:48:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120423134845.GH4935@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335184379_27774@CP5-2952>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:32:31PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:21:20 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On my specs bit29 is pipe assignement, we should set it if the panel is on
> > pipe B (well, it just takes the pll to do the modulation from that pipe
> > then).
>
> On CTL1 rather than CTL2, if that makes a difference. Listed in both the
> IBX and CPT specs as bit 29, backlight polarity. The joy of ever
> changing documentation.
Ah, in the PCH part, not the north display unit. I guess we have a little
mess here.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-23 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 9:32 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: clear up backlight inversion confusion on gen4 Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 9:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: pnv has a backlight polarity control bit, too Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 10:27 ` Chris Wilson
2012-04-23 9:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: clear up backlight inversion confusion on gen4 Chris Wilson
2012-04-23 12:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 12:32 ` Chris Wilson
2012-04-23 13:48 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
[not found] ` <4F9542EF.3010208@osadl.org>
2012-04-23 12:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 13:15 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-23 13:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 14:00 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-23 14:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 15:06 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-23 15:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 15:38 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-23 15:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-23 16:55 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: " Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: " Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: completely revert the invert brightness quirk Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: add quirk to indicate that an alt bit is used for brightness inversion Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 17:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-26 17:25 ` [PATCH] properly enable the blc controller on the right pipe Daniel Vetter
2012-04-26 17:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-26 19:12 ` Carsten Emde
2012-04-26 19:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-27 20:18 ` Carsten Emde
2012-06-02 23:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-11 8:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-19 14:00 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-19 14:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-19 22:51 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-20 8:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-24 7:30 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-25 22:35 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-26 11:55 ` [PATCH] drm/i915 disable combination mode Daniel Vetter
2012-07-26 12:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-26 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-26 14:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: assign the brightness inversion quirk to Acer Aspire 5734Z Carsten Emde
2012-04-27 16:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: Re: clear up backlight inversion confusion on gen4 Monark Gondaliya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120423134845.GH4935@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox