Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: be more careful when returning -ENXIO in gmbus transfer
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:24:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337624682_164153@CP5-2952> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337624388-32498-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Mon, 21 May 2012 20:19:48 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> ... flaky ddc hardware can cause a spurious NAK, resulting in the i2c
> core and drm edid functions not trying to retry the edid transfer.
> 
> Luckily the gmbus quiescenting also times out for these cases, so we
> can get out of this mess by returning -ETIMEDOUT for this specific
> case. This way we keep the fast-fail of returning -ENXIO if there is
> no device present, speeding up the boot process.
> 
> This regression has been introduced in
> 
> commit e646d5773572bf52017983d758bdf05777dc5600
> Author: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
> Date:   Fri Mar 30 19:46:38 2012 +0800
> 
>     drm/i915/intel_i2c: always wait for IDLE before clearing NAK
> 
> v2: Return -ETIMEDOUT for this case and keep the -ENXIO for real NAKs,
> suggested by Daniel Kurtz.
> 
> Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Julian Simioni <julian.simioni@gmail.com>
> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-21 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-14  5:56 [PATCH] drm/i915: don't return -ENXIO from gmbus xfer Daniel Vetter
2012-05-19 20:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-20 15:19   ` Daniel Vetter
     [not found]     ` <CAGS+omCnwFf-uKiQewMnprPJ5maSjS9ROeyoRTiYd_JRBjSBiQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-20 18:16       ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-21 18:19         ` [PATCH] drm/i915: be more careful when returning -ENXIO in gmbus transfer Daniel Vetter
2012-05-21 18:24           ` Chris Wilson [this message]
     [not found]             ` <CAGS+omANiYtmKX_z2m2J-5j7a-K0z2MJ=wE3PcZRATmyh_VGxQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-21 19:04               ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-21 18:20         ` [PATCH] drm/i915: don't return -ENXIO from gmbus xfer Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1337624682_164153@CP5-2952 \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox